On Sept. 16, the losing students filed a petition seeking Supreme Court review. If the high court takes the case and upholds the 7th Circuit, public university administrators nationwide will have carte blanche to suppress everything from criticism of university policies to analysis of national politics. Alarmed advocates of freedom of the press and academic freedom are seeking to have the Supreme Court reverse the 7th Circuit before other courts follow its lead.
Student editors of the Innovator at Governors State University in a suburb of Chicago editorialized against the administration’s refusal to renew the teaching contract of the paper’s faculty adviser. Margaret Hosty, a student, penned a number of columns attacking the dean who dismissed the adviser. University President Stuart Fagan reprimanded the newspaper for being irresponsible, and Dean of Student Affairs and Services Patricia Carter instructed the Innovator‘s printer not to produce any further issues. The printer, fearful of not being paid, complied. Publication of the independent student paper ceased, replaced by one under the administration’s control.
When Hosty and her fellow student journalists and editors sued in federal court, they prevailed in district court and then before a three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals. Hosty v. Carter, 325 F.3d 945 (7th Cir. 2003). The university, however, persuaded the full membership of the appellate court to reverse the panel by a vote of 7-4. Hosty v. Carter, No. 01-4155 (7th Cir. en banc, June 20, 2005). The majority thought that Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988), which gave elementary and high school administrators authority to censor school-sponsored student newspapers, applies to colleges, holding that an extracurricular newspaper could be governed by the university, even though the funds came from mandatory activity fees collected from students. The minority thought Hazelwood did not apply, stressing the significant differences between high school and college students in terms of academic freedom and personal maturity, refusing to infantilize—or subjugate—voting-age citizens.
Just a house organ?
If the 7th Circuit opinion stands, student newspapers could quickly become house organs, like alumni magazines, rather than independent forums of news and opinion. The independent student press at public colleges and universities would all but vanish, and not only in the Midwest. As the certiorari petition portends, the 7th Circuit’s opinion “threatens to restrict substantially the freedom of expression on college and university campuses throughout the nation.”
This legal erosion of student journalists’ rights on public university campuses mirrors a disturbing nationwide trend. Professional journalists face significant challenges from a culture that has inadequate respect for the role journalists play in a deliberative democracy. Defamation suits and punitive damages serve as a constant threat, while the reporter’s source privilege has been so tattered as to no longer effectively exist.
Students, administrators and civil libertarians have their eyes trained on the high court’s reception of the petition for review. Several amicus briefs by interested civil liberties and journalism organizations are reportedly in the works and will be filed by the Oct. 24 deadline.
The Student Press Law Center, a national watchdog organization, announced recently that it had learned that a few weeks after the Hosty decision, the general counsel of California State University sent a memo to all of the presidents of the various campuses in the system, advising of Hosty‘s potential reach: “[T]he case appears to signal that CSU campuses may have more latitude than previously believed to censor the content of subsidized student newspapers.”
“More latitude,” indeed! The 7th circuit’s opinion gives administrators unfettered discretion to become in effect the new editors of our nation’s college newspapers, even when student-paid fees, not tax monies, subsidize the paper.
Schools: Governors State University