University of Alabama: Pro-Choice Group Ordered to Get Permit for Non-Disruptive Expression or Face Arrest

Category: Free Speech
Schools: University of Alabama

On April 10, 2013, members of the Alabama Alliance for Sexual and Reproductive Justice (AASRJ) student group distributed fliers in response to a pro-life group’s event on the University of Alabama’s quad. After roughly one hour, UA police approached the students and ordered them to stop, warning them that without a grounds use permit they were subject to arrest for their activity. When AASRJ submitted that permit request in order to continue its counter-protest activities on April 11, the group was informed that the permit would not be approved in time, because the policy recommends requests be submitted “10 working days prior to the event.” FIRE wrote to UA President Judy Bonner on May 22, reminding UA that it may not constitutionally require student groups like AASRJ to obtain permits to engage in fundamental First Amendment activities. UA has failed to respond to FIRE’s letter, leaving student rights at UA in jeopardy.

There is currently no media coverage for this case.
  • ‘Tuscaloosa News’ Dings U of Alabama for Censorship of Pro-Choice Speech

    July 15, 2013

    Administrators at the University of Alabama (UA) are doing the seemingly impossible: bringing pro-choice and pro-life forces together to agree with one another. Unfortunately for the university, what both sides agree upon is that UA administrators are completely in the wrong when it comes to free speech.  UA’s decision to order the pro-choice Alabama Alliance for Sexual and Reproductive Justice (AASRJ) student group to stop passing out flyers in response to a pro-life display on campus has been roundly bashed, even by the sponsors of the pro-life display, Bama Students for Life. On Sunday, the editors of UA’s hometown newspaper, […]

    » Read More

  • U of Alabama Expresses Concern over Safety During … Leafleting?

    July 12, 2013

    The University of Alabama (UA) has yet to yield to the strong and justified pressure from students and free speech advocates to revise its grounds use policies, which require 10 days’ notice for even quiet and peaceful speech by student groups on campus. With the UA administration seemingly alone in defending the policies, it’s useful to take a look at the school’s stated reasons for hanging on to them. The Crimson White covered the controversy on Wednesday, and relayed comments from Cathy Andreen, AU’s director of the Office of Media Relations: “The grounds use permit process ensures that events, speeches, […]

    » Read More

  • FIRE’s Peter Bonilla on U of Alabama and Restrictions on Spontaneous Expression

    July 10, 2013

    In an article for PolicyMic today, director of FIRE’s Individual Rights Defense Program Peter Bonilla wrote to discuss the compelling reasons why free speech advocates are putting pressure on the University of Alabama to revise its grounds use policies, which require 10 days’ notice for protests—even quiet, peaceful ones—on campus. In his article, Peter explains the common sense problem with such a requirement, particularly as applied to students who want to engage in real-time discussions on current events. He notes that while narrowly-tailored time, place, and manner restrictions on speech are allowable in some circumstances in order to prevent disruption […]

    » Read More

  • Please Explain Why Putting University Administrators in Charge of Judging Speech Is a Good Idea

    July 9, 2013

    Architect Rolls and Plans – Shutterstock My colleagues have done a thorough job of explaining why defenders of the Department of Education’s “blueprint” for preventing campus sexual harassment are on very shaky legal and logical ground. They have pointed out that some of ED’s allies have misquoted the findings letter and mocked Senator John McCain’s serious questions about the threat to free speech and about OCR’s authority to impose this blueprint. Other defenders of the blueprint have brushed away concerns by portraying its definition of sexual harassment as “any unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature” as simply a way of encouraging reporting. […]

    » Read More

  • U of Alabama Fails to Respond to Letter on Speech Code; Students Consider New Strategies

    July 8, 2013

    Flyer graphic background – ShutterstockMore than six weeks after FIRE sent University of Alabama (UA) President Judy Bonner a letter explaining how UA’s grounds use policies unconstitutionally restrict students’ free speech rights, UA has still not responded, and students are expressing doubt that the university will revise the policies without legal pressure. To recap: Members of the Alabama Alliance for Sexual and Reproductive Justice (AASRJ) student organization were threatened with arrest for leafleting on campus without a permit. The act of leafleting was AASRJ’s peaceful and timely response to a demonstration by Bama Students for Life on the same day. […]

    » Read More

  • University of Alabama doesn’t respond to calls for policy revision following abortion debate

    July 5, 2013

    by Melissa Brown   TUSCALOOSA, Alabama — The University of Alabama appears to have no plans to modify its contentious grounds use policy following a public letter admonishing UA’s protection of students’ First Amendment rights and calling for change. On July 1, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) posted a letter to their website addressed to UA President Judy Bonner on behalf of an abortion rights student group who say police ordered them to stop distributing flyers on campus during the spring semester. The letter, originally sent in late May, requested comment from Bonner by mid-June. As of Friday, FIRE has […]

    » Read More

  • U of Alabama Policy Draws Criticism from Students, Free Speech Advocates

    July 2, 2013

    Melissa Brown wrote for (the online presence of several Alabama newspapers) yesterday to bring local attention to FIRE’s letter to the University of Alabama (UA) about its requirement that students obtain a permit several days in advance of distributing flyers and leaflets. As we reported yesterday, UA has not responded to our letter. Brown noted that UA students share FIRE’s concerns about the school’s grounds use policy. The editorial board of the The Crimson White, UA’s student newspaper, wrote in February to advocate for policy changes after university police officers halted filming of a Harlem Shake video. The Board’s […]

    » Read More

  • Foundation says University of Alabama policy violates students’ First Amendment rights

    July 1, 2013

    by Melissa Brown   TUSCALOOSA, Alabama – The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) has intervened on behalf of a University of Alabama pro-abortion rights student group who say police ordered them to stop distributing flyers on campus during the spring semester. In a letter sent to UA President Judy Bonner on May 22, FIRE requested that the university reassure its community that “expressive activity on campus” would not be censored. FIRE requested a response to the letter by June 12. “Please spare the University of Alabama the embarrassment of fighting against the Bill of Rights — a statement of both law and principle by […]

    » Read More

  • University of Alabama Tells Pro-Choice Group to Get Permit for Pamphlets or Face Arrest

    July 1, 2013

    TUSCALOOSA, Ala., July 1, 2013—University of Alabama police have ordered a pro-choice student group to cease distributing informational flyers on campus in response to another group’s pro-life event, and threatened members with arrest for failing to comply with its orders. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) has intervened at UA following this blatant and chilling abuse of student First Amendment rights. “Yet again, a public university bound by the First Amendment has regulated free speech far beyond what the Constitution allows,” said Robert Shibley, FIRE’s Senior Vice President. “The University of Alabama has no business telling a group […]

    » Read More