Lincoln University

Location: Lincoln University, Pennsylvania
Type: Public
Federal Circuit: 3rd Circuit

Speech Code Rating

Lincoln University has been given the speech code rating Red. A red light university has at least one policy that both clearly and substantially restricts freedom of speech. Read more here.

  • Pennsylvania House of Representatives Select Committee on Student Academic Freedom

    September 19, 2005

    The Pennsylvania House of Representatives brought together a committee to examine allegations that Pennsylvania’s public universities were plagued by liberal ideology and indoctrination. David A. French, at the time president of FIRE, served as a legal adviser to the panel. FIRE released FIRE Report on the First Amendment Responsibilities of Pennsylvania State-Funded Colleges and Universities, explaining that Pennsylvania universities are bound to follow the strictures of the U.S. and Pennsylvania Constitutions, notably to respect the expressive rights of students and faculty members, to protect religious liberty on campus, and to protect freedom of conscience on campus.

    » Read More

Red Light Policies

  • Student Handbook: Student Code of Conduct- Inappropriate Use of Language 13-14

    Speech Code Category: Policies on Tolerance, Respect, and Civility

    Social media is the interaction among people where they create, share, and exchange information and ideas in virtual communities and networks (Tweeter, facebook, instagram, pinter, snap, etc.). Social media comes with negative consequences (i.e. cyber- bullying, sexual harassment and decrease face to face interaction). Social media impacts the academic and social environment with negative outcomes, with some long term consequences. This violation includes: cyber-bullying or ANY negative use of social media that is not conducive of being a Lincoln University student.

    » Read More

  • Student Handbook: Student Code of Conduct- Sexual Harassment 13-14

    Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies

    Sexual harassment includes, but is not limited to, unsolicited, deliberate, or repeated sexual flirtations, advances or propositions; verbal abuse of a sexual nature; display of sexually suggestive pictures or objects; and/or offensive or abusive physical contact of a sexual nature is strictly prohibited.

    » Read More

  • Student Handbook: Title IX, Non-Discrimination, Sexual Harassment and Anti-Harassment Policy 13-14

    Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies

    Actions, words, jokes, or comments based on an individual’s sex, race, color, national origin, age, religion, disability, or any other legally protected characteristic will not be tolerated.

    » Read More

Yellow Light Policies
Green Light Policies
This school does not have any media coverage at this time.
  • Speech codes make universities intolerant

    January 5, 2006

    Have you ever known a legislator who didn’t think his job was terribly important?Imagine the campaign slogan: “Elect me, because who really cares?” Or the direct-mail letters: “It’d be nice if you sent me a donation — but it doesn’t really matter.” The very concept is ridiculous. But apparently someone forgot to tell that to state Rep. Dan Surra, D-Elk. Surra has been quoted in the news media as calling a committee on which he himself serves a “colossal waste of time.” This “colossal waste” is the bipartisan Select Committee on Student Academic Freedom, established last year via House Resolution […]

    » Read More
  • Speech Code of the Month: Lincoln University

    November 1, 2005

    FIRE announces its Speech Code of the Month for November 2005: Lincoln University. Lincoln, a public university in Pennsylvania, defines sexual harassment as “unwelcome and unsolicited sexual advances, request for sexual favors or other verbal, visual or physical conduct or communication with sexual overtones that the victim deems offensive” (emphasis added). This policy shamelessly violates clearly established Supreme Court precedent regarding harassment. Remember that, as a public institution, Lincoln is bound by the Constitution, and Supreme Court decisions are authoritative interpretations of what the Constitution means. And the Supreme Court has held that for conduct to constitute constitutionally unprotected harassment, […]

    » Read More