Michigan Technological University

Location: Houghton, Michigan
Website: http://www.mtu.edu
Type: Public
Federal Circuit: 6th Circuit

Speech Code Rating

Michigan Technological University has been given the speech code rating Red. A red light university has at least one policy that both clearly and substantially restricts freedom of speech. Read more here.

This school does not have any cases at this time.

Red Light Policies

  • Student Conduct Policies: Sexual and/or Relationship Misconduct 14-15

    Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies

    Prohibited Conduct

    Sexual Harassment—includes unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors and other verbal, nonverbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature.  Sexual harassment creates a hostile environment if the harassing conduct is sufficiently serious to deny or limit the student’s ability to participate in or benefit from an educational program.

    » Read More


Yellow Light Policies
  • Equity Office: Sexual Harassment Training- What is Sexual Harassment? 14-15

    Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies

    In educational and in workplace environments, it can result from inappropriate humor, comments based on someone’s gender, comments based on someone’s sexual orientation, or sharing sexually offensive materials. If any of these situations make a person uncomfortable, it can interfere with their ability and right to work in that environment.

    » Read More

  • Code of Community Conduct: Bullying and Cyberbullying 14-15

    Speech Code Category: Bullying Policies

    Bullying and cyberbullying are repeated and/or severe aggressive behaviors that intimidate or intentionally harm or control another physically or emotionally, and are not protected by freedom of expression.

    » Read More


Green Light Policies
  • Board of Control Bylaws and Policies: Sex Discrimination/Sexual Harassment 14-15

    Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies

    Sexual harassment is defined as unwelcomed sexual advances or requests for sexual favors; or other verbal or physical conduct or communication of a sexual or gender-related nature that is sufficiently severe, pervasive or objectively and subjectively offensive as to substantially or effectively disrupt or undermine a person’s ability to participate in or to receive the benefits, services or opportunities of the University when: … Such conduct substantially or effectively interferes with an individual’s employment, educational performance or receipt of services or education, by creating an intimidating, hostile, offensive or abusive employment, service, or educational environment.

    » Read More

  • Code of Community Conduct: Discriminatory Harassment 14-15

    Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies

    Engaging in severe, pervasive and objectively offensive conduct that is unwelcome, discriminatory (on the basis of race, religion or cultural identity, disability, sexual orientation, gender or gender identity, or ethnicity/national origin), and directed at an individual or a group of individuals so that it undermines the ability of the targeted individual(s) to access education equally. Discriminatory Harassment includes the creation of a hostile environment as well as attempts to create quid pro quo situations.

    » Read More

  • Code of Community Conduct: Assault, Endangerment and Threats 14-15

    Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies

    Intentionally or recklessly endangering, threatening or causing physical harm to any person (including self); or intentionally or recklessly causing reasonable apprehension of such harm; or communicating to any person (including communicating by any communication device, anonymously or otherwise), with intent to cause alarm or threaten another person for no legitimate purpose.

    » Read More


This school does not have any media coverage at this time.
  • With FIRE’s Policy Analysis in Hand, Michigan Tech to Revise ‘Red Light’ Sexual Harassment Policies

    November 2, 2011

    Back in December of last year, FIRE sent a national certified mass mailing to the presidents and general counsels at nearly 300 public colleges and universities. In our letter, we warned university leadership that in light of important legal developments during 2010, the case law regarding university speech codes was even clearer than before, and that institutional leaders and officials risked incurring personal liability for monetary damages if they continued to enact and maintain unconstitutional policies in violation of this body of law. In response to our mailing, we have received and continued to receive inquiries from a number of […]

    » Read More