University of Central Arkansas

Location: Conway, Arkansas
Website: http://www.uca.edu/
Type: Public
Federal Circuit: 8th Circuit

Speech Code Rating

University of Central Arkansas has been given the speech code rating Red. A red light university has at least one policy that both clearly and substantially restricts freedom of speech. Read more here.

This school does not have any cases at this time.

Red Light Policies

  • Student Handbook: Housing Facilities and Policies- Internet Communications 13-14

    Speech Code Category: Internet Usage Policies, Statement

    Communications on sites such as Facebook, MySpace, Xanga, and
    LiveJournal are public and open
    communication. Communications on such sites will not be policed by
    housing officials, but can be turned in to housing officials when they are
    seen as derogatory or harassing in nature.

    » Read More

  • Student Handbook: Computer Use Policy 13-14

    Speech Code Category: Internet Usage Policies, Statement

    Inappropriate uses of computing resources at the university include, but are not limited to, the following: ...
    Creating, transmitting, executing, or storing malicious, threatening,
    harassing, obscene, or abusive messages, images, programs, or
    materials.

    » Read More

  • Student Handbook: Offenses Subject to Disciplinary Action 13-14

    Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies, Statement

    Harassing, annoying, or alarming another person. This includes, but is
    not limited to, racial and sexual harassment, attempting or threatening
    to strike, kick or otherwise subject another person to physical contact;
    making an offensive coarse utterance, gesture, or display; addressing
    abusive language to any person; following a person in or about a
    public place or places; making threatening, obscene or disparaging
    remarks directed at another individual on Facebook, MySpace or other
    internet site; or engaging in a course of conduct or repeatedly
    committing acts that alarm or seriously annoy another person.

    » Read More


Yellow Light Policies
  • Free Speech Policy 13-14

    Speech Code Category: Protest and Demonstration Policies, Statement

    The area adjacent to the southwest corner of Ferguson
    Chapel, not to exceed fifty (50) feet in any direction, is hereby designated as
    a limited public forum. On a first-come, first-served basis individuals or
    organizations may utilize this designated forum for free speech purposes
    without registration, 24 hours a day, seven (7) days a week. However, no
    amplification equipment may be used and no structure(s) may be erected.
    All other areas of the campus must be scheduled for such use and
    approved by the university.

    » Read More

  • Student Handbook: Offenses Subject to Disciplinary Action 13-14

    Speech Code Category: Policies on Tolerance, Respect, and Civility, Statement

    Any student, non-student or student group found to have committed
    any of the following is subject to university disciplinary action: ... Disorderly conduct including, but not limited to, violent, noisy, or
    drunken behavior, and the use of abusive or obscene language on
    university controlled property or while representing the University, or
    attending a university function.
    ... Showing disrespect to university officials while carrying out their
    assigned duties. Disrespect may involve acts of violence or threatening
    violence including, but not limited to, physically striking or making
    verbal or written threats; inciting others to violence; interfering with
    official duties; failure to follow directives; and/or intimidation or
    harassing behavior including, but not limited to, invading personal
    space, yelling, screaming, yelling obscenities or making obscene
    gestures.

    » Read More

  • Sexual Harassment and Other Forms of Harassment 13-14

    Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies, Statement

    Other forms of harassment based upon race, religion, national origin, sexual
    orientation, or age may have the same impact as sexual harassment. In the absence of
    other policies addressing these specific issues, the university encourages the use of the
    steps and procedures in this policy in reporting other types of harassment and will generally
    conduct investigations of those complaints in the same manner.

    » Read More


Green Light Policies
  • Free Speech Policy 13-14

    Speech Code Category: Advertised Commitments to Free Expression, Statement

    The university believes that the right of expression is as
    necessary as the right of inquiry and both must be preserved as essential to
    the pursuit and dissemination of knowledge and truth.

    » Read More


  • University of Central Arkansas ‘Annoying’ Speech Policy Axed

    July 6, 2013

    by Russell Westerholm at University Herald  Prompted by an academic watchdog group, the University of Central Arkansas (UCA) rewrote part of speech policy, CampusReform.org reported. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) called “unconstitutional” the section in UCA’s student handbook that stated disciplinary action could be taken on a student for “annoying” another person. “Students have no way to know what might be punishable since the policy conditions the permissibility of speech entirely upon the subjective reaction of the listener,” FIRE wrote in a blog post announcing the issue. “What might seem like a lively debate to one person could […]

    » Read More
  • OK to be ‘annoyed’ in Arkansas: University backtracks on free speech restrictions

    July 19, 2013

    by Bob Kellogg OneNewsNow   The University of Central Arkansas did a quick about face on its speech code after an academic watchdog group pointed out it was unconstitutional. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, or FIRE, contacted the University of Central Arkansas about its policy which stated students could be punished for “annoying” speech. “Whenever policy prohibits annoying another person and actually uses the word ‘annoying,’ that is unbelievably subjective,” explains Azhar Majeed, director of Legal and Public Advocacy at FIRE. Such policies put “protected speech at risk of punishment,” he adds. He says the UCA policy even tried […]

    » Read More
  • University of Central Arkansas Reviews ‘Speech Code of the Month,’ Promises to Revise Policy

    July 9, 2013

    In a victory for free speech on campus, the University of Central Arkansas (UCA) has promised to eliminate a speech code that FIRE identified as our “Speech Code of the Month” for July 2013. The promise comes just days after FIRE Director of Speech Code Research Samantha Harris challenged the policy on FIRE’s website, writing that the code is overly broad and violates the First Amendment, which UCA—as a public university—must uphold. FIRE defines a “speech code” as any university regulation or policy that prohibits expression that would be protected by the First Amendment in society at large. Each month, FIRE features […]

    » Read More
  • University reverses speech code following report from watchdog group calling it unconstitutional

    July 5, 2013

    by Oliver Darcy Campus Reform   The University of Central Arkansas (UCA) reversed part of its speech code on Wednesday after an academic watchdog group said a portion of it was unconstitutional earlier that day. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) took issue with the part of UCA’s list of “offenses subject to disciplinary action” which said students could face punishment for “annoying” another person on campus. In a blog post, FIRE contended such speech is constitutionally protected by the First Amendment. Katie Henry, interim general counsel at UCA, agreed and said the school will remove the language. “[T]he […]

    » Read More
  • Speech Code of the Month: University of Central Arkansas

    July 3, 2013

    FIRE announces its Speech Code of the Month for July 2013: the University of Central Arkansas (UCA). If you are applying to UCA, you had better make sure to brush up on your social skills, because UCA’s list of “Offenses Subject to Disciplinary Action” (PDF) includes “annoying” another person. This policy is overly broad because nearly all “annoying” speech is fully protected by the First Amendment. Indeed, at the risk of sounding like a broken record, the U.S. Supreme Court explicitly said as much in Terminiello v. Chicago, 337 U.S. 1, 4 (1949), when it held that “freedom of speech, […]

    » Read More