University of Oklahoma

Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Type: Public
Federal Circuit: 10th Circuit

Speech Code Rating

University of Oklahoma has been given the speech code rating Yellow. Yellow light colleges and universities are those institutions with at least one ambiguous policy that too easily encourages administrative abuse and arbitrary application. Read more here.

  • University of Oklahoma: State Legislature Investigates University for Hosting Controversial Speaker

    May 15, 2009

    Noted evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins waived his speaker fee and came to the University of Oklahoma to speak for the 150th anniversary of Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution. The Oklahoma state legislature, which considered passing legislation deeming Darwin’s theory “unproven and unpopular,” launched an investigation into Dawkins’ speech. The legislature requested all e-mails pertaining to the speech as well as the total cost of the speech, including any money that Dawkins might have received. By investigating a speech based on the unpopular views of the speaker, the state legislature is endangering free speech, creating a chilling effect by implying that […]

    » Read More
  • University of Oklahoma: Ban on E-mailing Political Humor or Commentary

    January 26, 2008

    Weeks prior to the 2008 presidential election, the University of Oklahoma (OU) notified students and faculty that “the forwarding of political humor/commentary” using their university email accounts was prohibited. After FIRE wrote OU President David L. Boren, explaining that the policy violated the right to freedom of speech, Boren replied that the policy was intended to be applicable only “to the extent discussions are attributable to the University as endorsing or opposing a political candidate.” Boren issued a university-wide statement on October 27, 2008, fully rescinding the earlier email and stating that OU policy “does not limit the right of anyone to express […]

    » Read More
  • University of Oklahoma: Plot to Punish Professor for Political Beliefs, Whistleblowing

    December 28, 2004

    At the University of Oklahoma, the School of Geology and Geophysics attempted to silence Professor David Deming, a frequent critic of administrative policy and a politically outspoken faculty member. OU removed him from his department, stripped him of most of his classes, and moved his office to a converted basement lab. After controversial remarks in Oklahoma Daily newspaper, Roger Slatt, Director of Geology and Geophysics, began to unconstitutionally monitor Deming’s letters to the newspaper and include them in three professional evaluations, until directed to stop by OU President David L. Boren. Slatt and his colleagues did not stop there, however. […]

    » Read More
  • University of Oklahoma: Use of Sexual Harassment Allegations to Suppress Protected Speech

    March 23, 2000

    At the University of Oklahoma David Deming, an associate professor of Geology and Geophysics, criticized an opinion column that stated: “Easy access to a handgun allows everyone in this country . . . to quickly and easily kill as many random people as they want.” A citizen who holds protected beliefs about the Second Amendment, Deming responded with a letter that stated: “[Her] easy access to a vagina enables her to quickly and easily have sex with as many random people as she wants . . . and spread venereal diseases.” In response, the Dean of the College of Geosciences, […]

    » Read More
Yellow Light Policies
  • Interim Policy on Acceptable Use of Information Resources 13-14

    Speech Code Category: Internet Usage Policies

    The following are examples of uses that are unacceptable: … use University systems for commercial or partisan political purposes, such as using electronic mail to circulate advertising for products or for political candidates.

    » Read More

  • Facility Use and Solicitation Policy for Registered Student Organizations and Individual OU Students 13-14

    Speech Code Category: Other Speech Codes

    The University of Oklahoma Chief of Police, or his or her designee, shall have the final decisionmaking capability and will decide how many police officers will be present, if any, and how many security personnel will be present, if any, after being properly advised as to the facts surrounding the event and the likelihood of potential disruptions or security threats … The RSO/student shall be responsible for the cost of additional security.

    » Read More

  • Regents’ Policy Manual: Sexual Harassment/Sexual Assault Policy 13-14

    Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies

    Sexual harassment shall be defined as unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature in the following context: … when such conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an individual’s work or academic performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working or academic environment.

    Conduct prohibited by this policy may include, but is not limited to:

    • Unwelcome sexual flirtation; advances or propositions for sexual activity
    • Continued or repeated verbal abuse of a sexual nature, such as suggestive comments and sexually explicit jokes.
    • Sexually degrading language to describe an individual.
    • Remarks of a sexual nature to describe a person’s body or clothing.
    • Display of sexually demeaning objects or pictures.

    » Read More

  • Community Living Guide: Room Decorations 13-14

    Speech Code Category: Posting Policies

    Residence Life staff have the authority to ask a student to remove inappropriate or offensive decorations. Failure to remove the decoration or display could result in a failure to comply citation.

    » Read More

Green Light Policies
  • Non-Discrimination Policy 13-14

    Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies

    Harassment as a form of discrimination is defined as verbal or physical conduct that is directed at an individual or a group because of race, color, sex … sexual orientation, genetic information, religion, political beliefs, national origin, age (40 or older), disability, or veteran status when such conduct is sufficiently severe, pervasive and objectively offensive so as to have the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an individual’s or group’s academic or work performance or of creating a hostile academic or work environment viewed by examining a totality of the circumstances from the standpoint of a reasonable person with the same characteristics as the purported recipient of the harassing conduct.

    » Read More

  • Facility Use and Solicitation Policy for Registered Student Organizations and Individual OU Students 13-14

    Speech Code Category: Protest and Demonstration Policies

    There are several areas located on the University campus that are open to students and RSOs for free speech, protests, leafleting, etc. and require no reservation or notice (unless such use also includes the placement of tables, booths, structures, large displays, vehicles, sound, audio or PA systems, or when assistance is needed from the University, in which case reservations as noted in Paragraph B below are required) … The public areas for use by RSOs/Students include all public sidewalks, and the following areas:

    Areas Governed by Student Life (
    Concrete South of Bizzell Statue
    East side of Dale Hall
    West side of Gaylord Hall
    Lloyd Noble Parking Lot-Southeast Quadrant
    Duck Pond
    South Oval (West side grassy area and East side grassy area)
    Unity Garden
    East side Dale Hall, Copeland Hall, Kaufman Hall, Gittinger Hall or Nielson Hall
    West side of Gaylord Hall, Gould Hall, George Lynn Cross Hall or Richards Hall
    East side of Physical Science Center
    West lawn of Felgar Hall
    Gould Hall courtyard
    Library Mall walkway north of Nielson Hall
    Dale Hall breezeway
    Non-landscaped areas of the North Oval
    The grassy area immediately north of Evans Hall

    » Read More

  • Student Rights and Responsibilities Code: Prohibited Conduct 13-14

    Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies

    Abusive conduct: Unwelcome conduct that is sufficiently severe and pervasive that it alters the conditions of education or employment and creates an environment that a reasonable person would find intimidating, harassing or humiliating. … Mental harassment: Intentional conduct that is so extreme and outrageous that a reasonable person would not tolerate it.

    » Read More

  • Sexual Misconduct, Discrimination & Sexual Harassment Policy 13-14

    Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies

    Sexual harassment is unwelcome and discriminatory speech or conduct undertaken because of an individual’s gender or is sexual in nature and is so severe, pervasive, or persistent, objectively and subjectively offensive that it has the systematic effect of unreasonably interfering with or depriving someone of educational, institutional, or employment access, benefits, activities, or opportunities.

    Other forms of misconduct based on one’s gender also constitute violations of this policy including: threatening or causing physical harm, extreme verbal abuse, or other conduct which threatens or endangers the health or safety of any person … Bullying, defined as repeated and/or severe aggressive behavior likely to intimidate or intentionally hurt, control or diminish another person, physically or mentally (that is not speech or conduct otherwise protected by the First Amendment).

    » Read More

  • Colleges have free speech on the run

    November 30, 2012

     In 2007, Keith John Sampson, a middle-aged student working his way through Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis as a janitor, was declared guilty of racial harassment. Without granting Sampson a hearing, the university administration — acting as prosecutor, judge and jury — convicted him of “openly reading [a] book related to a historically and racially abhorrent subject.” “Openly.” “Related to.” Good grief. The book, “Notre Dame vs. the Klan,” celebrated the 1924 defeat of the Ku Klux Klan in a fight with Notre Dame students. But some of Sampson’s co-workers disliked the book’s cover, which featured a black-and-white photograph of a Klan […]

    » Read More
  • 5 Free Speech Threats to Watch Out for on Campus This Election Season

    September 11, 2012

    In its 13 years defending free speech on colleges campuses nationwide, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), where I have worked since 2008, has won nearly 250 public victories on behalf of students and faculty. FIRE has been responsible for well over 100 reforms of unconstitutional and illiberal campus speech policies, with the total number of affected students reaching into the millions.  Needless to say, in all that time FIRE has seen certain types of violations committed over and over. Now, with the linens and seersucker put away and the new school year officially in business, I thought I would […]

    » Read More
  • COLUMN: “National Freedom of Speech Week” reminds us of core value

    October 22, 2009

    Freedom of speech is one of the most essential freedoms in the United States, and its value and importance on college campuses cannot be understated. This week is “National Freedom of Speech Week,” a perfect time to reflect on the importance of free speech and how it is being viewed and upheld here at OU. Colleges and universities are among the most common organizations to regularly advertise allegiance to free speech on their campuses. When first applying for college, many of us looked through different universities’ prospective student brochures. Almost all of them proclaim that one of the school’s core […]

    » Read More
  • Engaging the Oklahoma legislature on its decision to investigate Richard Dawkins’ free speech

    May 20, 2009

    by Greg Lukianoff The Huffington Post   Back in March, I uncovered that members of the Oklahoma state legislature had launched an investigation of a March 6 speech at the University of Oklahoma by noted evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins. The investigation was preceded by an attempt by another Oklahoma legislator to pass two bills condemning Dawkins and proclaiming the theory of evolution as “an unproven and unpopular theory.” Another representative, Rebecca Hamilton, followed up with a post-speech letter to the university demanding all e-mails and correspondence relating to the speech; a list of all money paid to Dawkins, public or […]

    » Read More
  • Is Oklahoma investigating Richard Dawkins free speech?

    March 14, 2009

    In a case that harkens back to the old-timey censorship of yesteryear, it appears that the Oklahoma legislature is pulling out the stops to oppose the University of Oklahoma’s decision to host the Oxford evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins on its campus. Dawkins was invited to speak at an event celebrating the 150th anniversary of Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution. In a move sure to score political points with some constituents, Oklahoma representative Todd Thomsen proposed not one but two resolutions condemning Dawkins and asking the University to disinvite him. One of the resolutions reads: A Resolution expressing disapproval of the […]

    » Read More
  • Students fight for free speech

    November 5, 2008

    The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, or FIRE, created a political activity policy for colleges and universities to abide by in response to a string of complaints accusing colleges across the country of silencing student and faculty political expression. FIRE, a nonprofit educational foundation, wants all public colleges and universities to acknowledge that students and student groups can express themselves politically on campus under the First Amendment and that faculty employees enjoy the right to engage in partisan political speech when occurring outside of their “employment-related” activities. FIRE released the statement of policy on political activity for campuses Oct.15 […]

    » Read More
  • The Chill Is Nothing New

    September 9, 2005

    There is a chill on campus, but that’s nothing new. For decades, campus speech has been chilled by speech codes and other attempts to prevent expression that might offend. Some would like to imagine that the excesses of “political correctness” are ancient history, but repression in the name of tolerance hasn’t gone anywhere. Oppressive speech codes are not only still around—they have actually multiplied, even after numerous court decisions declared them unconstitutional. Within the past year, college students have been punished for such things as expressing a religious objection to homosexuality and arguing that corporal punishment may be acceptable. Students […]

    » Read More
  • Professor’s case exposes bias

    February 23, 2005

    Tenure hasn’t been all it’s cracked up to be for University of Oklahoma professor David Deming. Sure, he still has a job, but it wasn’t enough to keep him out of the basement. Deming’s situation is a perfect example of what’s wrong with today’s academic establishment. The modern academy is too often characterized by political and intellectual conformism and a willingness to silence people who don’t just go along to get along — people like Deming. OU faces a federal lawsuit for removing Deming from its geology department, stripping him of classes, and, in a ridiculous attempt at punishment, actually […]

    » Read More
  • UI free speech policy disappoints

    January 12, 2005

    Certainly our freedom of speech is one of the most cherished and fundamental rights in this country. Unfortunately, the United States falls far short of the ideal put forth in the old saying, “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” Far too many people are now more than willing to suppress the speech of others simply because they find it offensive. Perhaps the most frightening aspect of this move towards oppression is that our nation’s universities are leading the way. At the University of Oklahoma, a disgraceful group of […]

    » Read More
  • Pro-Gun Professor Claims University Denied Him Free Speech

    December 13, 2004

    ( – The issues of gun control and free speech dominate a lawsuit filed by an Oklahoma University geology professor who used a blunt sexual comparison to criticize a pro-gun control newspaper column and later was demoted for that and other perceived transgressions. The letter that geology professor David Deming wrote to the editor of the Oklahoma Daily newspaper in February 2000 argued that the owner of an unregistered gun was no more likely to become a murderer than a woman who had not registered her sex organ was to becoming a prostitute. The letter prompted 25 charges of sexual […]

    » Read More
  • Harassed Professor Files Suit Against Univ. of Oklahoma

    December 10, 2004

      (AgapePress) – Administrators at the University of Oklahoma are being accused of conspiring to punish an outspoken professor for his political views.   Tenured geology professor David Deming has filed a lawsuit against OU for stripping him of his office and most of this courses. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), which has advocated on his behalf, claims OU administrators plotted to ostracize Deming for his outspoken political views and attempts at whistle blowing.   FIRE’s Greg Lukianoff notes that four years ago, Deming was charged with sexual harassment for mocking a columnist’s pro-gun control arguments. Since […]

    » Read More
  • The Man Without a Department

    February 27, 2004

    Norman, Okla. From David Deming’s old desk up on the ninth floor, he could look out the window over hundreds of houses east of the University of Oklahoma campus here. It wasn’t an awe-inspiring vista, but it was something. In his new office in the basement, he has a great view of a sink. Mr. Deming is a tenured associate professor in the School of Geology and Geophysics. Or rather, he used to be in the school. Because of a feud with the administration, he has been removed, placed in a strange limbo the university calls a “dean direct” position. […]

    » Read More
  • U. of Oklahoma Won’t Pursue Complaints Against Professor Who Compared Gun to Vagina

    May 8, 2000

    By JOEL HARDI     Facing the threat of a federal lawsuit, the University of Oklahoma on Thursday dropped its investigation into whether a professor’s controversial comparison of a handgun to a vagina broke the university’s sexual-harassment rules.     More than 25 people filed complaints with the university in February, accusing David Deming, an associate professor of geology and a self-described gun owner, of sexual harassment. In a letter to the editor of Oklahoma’s student newspaper, the Oklahoma Daily, he had mocked a columnist’s arguments for gun control, saying that “her possession of an unregistered vagina also equips her […]

    » Read More
  • Thought Reform 101

    March 1, 2000

    At Wake Forest University last fall, one of the few events designated as “mandatory” for freshman orientation was attendance at Blue Eyed, a filmed racism awareness workshop in which whites are abused, ridiculed, made to fail, and taught helpless passivity so that they can identify with “a person of color for a day.” In Swarthmore College’s dormitories, in the fall of 1998, first-year students were asked to line up by skin color, from lightest to darkest, and to step forward and talk about how they felt concerning their place in that line. Indeed, at almost all of our campuses, some […]

    » Read More
  • U. of Oklahoma President Defends Speech Rights of Marching Band Members

    October 21, 2014

    University of Oklahoma (OU) President David Boren took a stand for students’ free speech rights after learning that members of the university’s marching band, The Pride of Oklahoma, were forced to agree in writing not to make negative remarks about the group’s leadership. A group of band members wrote an open letter to Boren (PDF) that was published in several newspapers on Friday, speaking out about the restrictions on their speech and asking Boren to hire a new band director. Students and alumni, the letter said, are embarrassed by the current state of the band and “poor leadership” by its […]

    » Read More
  • Rights in the News: FIRE Enters the Fray Over Dawkins Investigation in Oklahoma

    March 20, 2009

    In his column posted last weekend on, Greg helped bring attention to what is potentially a deeply troubling breach of free expression: the rumored investigation of the University of Oklahoma’s funding of a speech by evolutionary biologist and bestselling author Richard Dawkins by the state’s legislature. As Claire noted on Monday, Greg’s post has attracted attention from blogs both nationally and internationally; as of today it has also received 270 comments on Dawkins’ site. And as Greg notes in his most recent column for The Huffington Post, an investigation is indeed afoot. Be sure to read his column for […]

    » Read More
  • Greg in ‘Huffington Post’ on the Oklahoma Legislature’s Investigation of Dawkins

    March 20, 2009

    In an article for The Huffington Post this afternoon, Greg confirms that the Oklahoma Legislature did in fact investigate the University of Oklahoma for hosting Richard Dawkins in early March. This post, a follow up to his article last weekend, cites a letter received by FIRE today verifying that Oklahoma State Representative Rebecca Hamilton requested that the university provide information about all costs associated with Dawkins’ speech. As Greg summarizes: Representative Hamilton’s exhaustive request included demands for all e-mails and correspondence relating to the speech; a list of all money paid to Dawkins and the entities, public or private, responsible […]

    » Read More
  • Oklahoma legislature investigates Richard Dawkins’ free speech

    March 20, 2009

    by Greg Lukianoff The Huffington Post   Well, it’s official: Oklahoma’s state legislature is investigating the University of Oklahoma for hosting a speech by evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins. As I noted in a post over the weekend at Dawkins’ website, the legislature first considered two resolutions condemning both Dawkins and the theory of evolution as “an unproven and unpopular theory.” (I highly recommend reading both of the proposed resolutions.) Despite their efforts, the legislature failed to prevent Dawkins from speaking on March 6 to an audience of thousands at the University of Oklahoma. Last week, however, I received multiple reports […]

    » Read More
  • Greg Discusses Oklahoma Legislature’s Rumored Investigation of Richard Dawkins’ Speech

    March 16, 2009

    FIRE President Greg Lukianoff has weighed in on the controversy surrounding noted evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins’ speech at the University of Oklahoma last week in an article entitled “Is Oklahoma Investigating Richard Dawkins’ Free Speech?” For those who have not been following the situation, Dawkins delivered a speech at a campus event celebrating the 150th anniversary of Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution. Prior to the event, a member of the Oklahoma state legislature filed two legislative resolutions condemning Dawkins’ invitation to campus.   Though Dawkins’ speech proceeded as planned on March 6, drawing an audience of thousands, FIRE has received […]

    » Read More
  • Repression of Political Speech and Activity Abounds on College Campuses in 2008

    December 24, 2008

    In an election year when the presidential race between Senators Barack Obama and John McCain dominated much of the country’s attention and media headlines, college and university campuses were certainly not immune to election fever. University students and faculty across the nation joined in the multitude of voices advocating for, criticizing, protesting, and otherwise commenting on the candidates and the hot-button issues of the season. With this came some regrettable consequences. This year, we witnessed a number of colleges and universities prohibiting and punishing many forms of constitutionally protected political speech and activity. While the rights of students and faculty […]

    » Read More
  • Weekly Media Round-up: Victory at Temple College Highlights FIRE’s Week

    November 7, 2008

    FIRE scored another victory for free speech and academic freedom this week with its successful intervention on behalf of Kerry Laird, an instructor at Temple College (TX) who was ordered to remove a religiously themed cartoon and a quote from Friedrich Nietzsche translating to “God is dead” from his office door. Within half an hour of receiving FIRE’s letter, Temple College President Glenda O. Barron swiftly and commendably reversed the order and reaffirmed Laird’s constitutional rights at the public college. Scott Jaschik, writing for Inside Higher Ed, ably captures both the gravity of the constitutional issues at stake at Temple […]

    » Read More
  • Weekly Media Round-up: National Media Takes Quinnipiac to School, With FIRE’s Help

    October 31, 2008

    The national media has officially descended on Quinnipiac University (QU), with FIRE’s early efforts to end the injustices visited on the Quad News and the QU chapter of the Society for Professional Journalists (SPJ) helping to pave the way. FIRE’s press release issued Wednesday helped to bring a new wave of attention to QU’s shoddy treatment of the newly formed Quad News, as well as the administration’s threats against the SPJ for associating with that independent publication. Law professor Eugene Volokh is only one of many to take notice of FIRE’s warning to QU; the Free Expression Network and the […]

    » Read More
  • Greg in ‘The Huffington Post’ on ‘A Tale of Two Universities’

    October 31, 2008

    FIRE President Greg Lukianoff has a new post at The Huffington Post comparing FIRE’s recent cases at the University of Oklahoma and Quinnipiac University. Greg begins his comparison by mentioning our recent victory at the University of Oklahoma, where the college president recently rescinded a campus-wide ban on political emails. Greg explains that “it is rare that one sees a college president flatly and publicly reverse him or herself” which is why “President Boren should be commended for clarifying this murky policy.” But as Greg is quick to mention, the positive development at OU stands in sharp contrast to the […]

    » Read More
  • Victory for Free Speech at University of Oklahoma: Ban on Political E-mails Rescinded

    October 28, 2008

    In a resounding victory for free speech, the University of Oklahoma (OU) has rescinded a September statement that banned the use of university e-mail accounts to engage in protected political expression. The reversal is a welcome confirmation of the First Amendment right of OU students, faculty, and staff to engage in protected political expression during this exciting election season and beyond. Here’s the timeline: On September 12, Nicholas S. Hathaway, Executive Vice President and Vice President of Administration and Finance, sent an e-mail to all University of Oklahoma students, faculty, and staff, informing them that university e-mail accounts “may not […]

    » Read More
  • Boren changes political expression e-mail policy

    October 28, 2008

    OU President David L. Boren sent a campus-wide e-mail Monday revoking an OU policy over political expression on the OU e-mail system. Boren’s decision to clarify the university’s position came after several OU students and a national individual rights group expressed concern with a Sept. 12 e-mail from Nick Hathaway, vice president for executive and administrative affairs. In the clarification e-mail sent Monday, Boren said he admired those who questioned the original e-mail and thought a clarification to the OU community was appropriate. “I applaud those who asked the questions about this policy which was worded to make it appear […]

    » Read More
  • FIRE warns multiple universities that political speech bans could be unconstitutional

    October 22, 2008

    The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education created a political activity policy for colleges and universities to abide by in response to a string of complaints accusing colleges across the country of silencing student and faculty political expression. FIRE, a nonprofit educational foundation, wants all public colleges and universities to acknowledge that students and student groups can express themselves politically on campus under the First Amendment and that faculty employees enjoy the right to engage in partisan political speech when occurring outside of their “employment-related” activities. FIRE released the statement of policy on political activity for campuses Oct.15 following several […]

    » Read More
  • As election nears, censorship fever hits college campuses

    October 17, 2008

    If you’re a student at the University of Oklahoma and you enjoy The Huffington Post, beware: Your school has forbidden you from forwarding any of the fabulous political content you may find on this site. Sounds crazy, but sadly it’s true. Students at the University of Oklahoma have been warned not to use their university e-mail accounts for “the forwarding of political humor/commentary” during this election season. Meanwhile, anyone who has an actual opinion on the election should think twice about expressing it on a bumper sticker at the University of Illinois, or in their dorm window at University of […]

    » Read More
  • With Election Weeks Away, Political Speech Under Attack on America’s Campuses

    October 15, 2008

    PHILADELPHIA, October 15, 2008—With the presidential race between John McCain and Barack Obama the focus of national attention, political speech on our nation’s campuses has come under sharp attack. In recent weeks, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) has investigated open and blatant attacks on political expression at colleges and universities across the country, from a previously unreported case at Oklahoma, to better-known cases at Illinois and Texas, to cases at smaller schools across the country. This alarming trend towards silencing political expression has prompted FIRE to release a Policy Statement on Political Activity on Campus today. At […]

    » Read More
  • New York teachers sue over ban on campaign buttons

    October 10, 2008

    The teachers’ union for the nation’s largest public school system accused the city on Friday of banning political campaign buttons and sued to reverse the policy, declaring that free speech rights were violated. United Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten announced at a news conference that a lawsuit had been filed in U.S. District Court in Manhattan to challenge the enforcement of the policy. “We couldn’t believe it,” said Weingarten, who wore a Barack Obama lapel button. The American Federation of Teachers, including its UFT delegates, voted over the summer to endorse Obama’s presidential candidacy. Weingarten said schools Chancellor Joel […]

    » Read More
  • National Attention Continues for FIRE’s Work at Illinois

    October 8, 2008

    We blogged last week about the Chicago Tribune‘s coverage of FIRE’s letter in defense of political expression at the three University of Illinois (UI) campuses, where a memo circulated by UI’s ethics office banned a wide variety of political expression on campuses—down to the bumper stickers on the cars of UI faculty and staff. Instead of waiting until our usual end-of-the-week media round-up, we wanted to provide a brief update on the continued media exposure to FIRE stemming from UI as the situation has developed. Over the weekend the Associated Press, picking up on the Tribune‘s lead, covered a rally […]

    » Read More
  • Weekly Media Round-up: FIRE’s Expertise Widely Cited, and Pressure Grows on Brandeis and Third Circuit Schools

    October 3, 2008

    Today’s Chicago Tribune featured an article examining the widening controversy over restrictions on political speech and activity at the University of Illinois, which go so far as to suggest that displaying a candidate’s bumper sticker on one’s car is out of bounds. FIRE is closely monitoring this case, as well as a similar situation at the University of Oklahoma, where all manner of political speech has been banned from the university network. FIRE has sent letters to both universities, asking for immediate clarification of the policies consistent with each school’s legal obligation to uphold the First Amendment on campus. Hopefully […]

    » Read More
  • At U. of I., a question of supporting candidates on campus

    October 3, 2008

    Students and professors at the University of Illinois decided to rally for Barack Obama on the Urbana-Champaign campus Thursday to make clear their stand on an increasingly controversial question as the November elections approach: Is it legal for employees and students at state colleges to express support for political candidates while on campus? The university’s administration has sparked outrage by telling faculty, staff and graduate students that a 5-year-old state law designed to prevent state workers from campaigning for candidates on state time or with state resources meant they could not express support for candidates or parties through pins, T-shirts […]

    » Read More
  • The ‘N-Word,’ the P.C. Police, and Honest Dialogue About Race

    May 19, 2005

    Earlier this month, University of Oklahoma baseball coach Larry Cochell resigned because of his use of the word “nigger” in comments he made regarding a black student athlete that were picked up by the media. An article, “Let’s Talk About Race,” by Lovell Estell III posted on AlterNet today provides a critical analysis of the case and how the enforcement of superficial political correctness often trumps transformative dialogue. Estell writes:  The hypocrisy in America is monumental between what is allowed by our rules of civic discourse and what some white people say when they think the microphones are turned off […]

    » Read More
  • Alabama and the American Flag

    March 1, 2005

    Reader Fletcher Moore writes in regard to my post from Monday in which I stated that the University of Alabama was, “after all, the school that banned the American flag from dorm windows.” Mr. Moore responds: If you follow your own link, you’ll note that the policy applied to “all window displays in student dormitories,” and was created in response to the display of a Confederate flag. Students hung American flags in response to the policy, as a means of protest. To be sure, the policy is crude and contrary to a signal American freedom, but it was not as […]

    » Read More
  • ‘The Oklahoman’ Runs FIRE’s Column on Bias at OU

    February 23, 2005

    The Oklahoma City Oklahoman today published my column on the most recent case at the University of Oklahoma (OU) involving geology professor David Deming. FIRE has been defending Professor Deming for years against OU administrators who seem willing to go to nearly any lengths to get this gadfly out of their hair. Back in 2000, OU tried to punish Prof. Deming for “sexual harassment” for writing a letter to the campus paper in support of gun rights that some people found offensive. FIRE came to Prof. Deming’s defense, and between FIRE’s involvement and the threat of a free speech lawsuit […]

    » Read More
  • University of Oklahoma Administration Plots to Punish Professor for Political Beliefs, Whistleblowing

    December 8, 2004

    NORMAN, Okla., December 7, 2004—The University of Oklahoma (OU) School of Geology and Geophysics has taken academic infighting to a new low in its efforts to silence Professor David Deming, a frequent critic of administrative policy and a politically outspoken faculty member.   Professor Deming has filed a federal lawsuit after OU removed him from his department, stripped him of most of his classes, and moved his office to a converted basement lab, all while claiming to respect the principles of academic freedom.  Public records requests have uncovered damning evidence that OU administrators schemed to marginalize and isolate him for his […]

    » Read More
  • Oklahoma Professor’s First Amendment Rights Still Under Threat

    March 23, 2000

    PHILADELPHIA, PA– In a case that illustrates the threat to liberty posed by political correctness, a professor at the University of Oklahoma was the target of more than twenty sexual harassment complaints filed with the University of Oklahoma’s affirmative action office as a result of a letter that he wrote to the student newspaper. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) has adopted Professor David Deming’s case. FIRE is working closely with the Washington-based Center for Individual Rights, a public interest legal foundation now serving as Deming’s counsel. Deming faced possible termination for daring to comment on an issue […]

    » Read More