Table of Contents
The Violence Against Women Act and Double Jeopardy in Higher Education
The recent Senate version of the Violence Against Women Act reauthorization included a provision tying institutional receipt of federal education funds to "dual appeal" rights for both accuser and accused. This proposal raises serious double jeopardy and due process questions concerning college disciplinary proceedings, particularly at public universities. This article explores the constitutional rights issues at stake when accused students are subjected to rehearings before college disciplinary boards.
Read more at The Stanford Law Review Online
Recent Articles
FIRE’s award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.
Campus encampment bans rarely violate the First Amendment. Here’s why.
Does the First Amendment allow public universities to ban students from erecting tents and camping on campus?
University provosts have bleak outlook on free expression in higher ed
College administrators are worried about the trajectory of free speech in higher ed.
With colleges punishing student protesters, campus due process is more important than ever
Administrators must provide fair, consistent procedures for students accused of misconduct.
Free Speech in (college) crisis times: Thoughts and resources — First Amendment News 421
First Amendment News is a weekly blog and newsletter about free expression issues by Ronald K. L. Collins and is editorially independent from FIRE.