Table of Contents
Defining ‘Harassment’ Down at SUNY-New Paltz
FIRE intern Acton Gorton has this commentary on recent goings-on in New York State:
***
Telling someone to “shut up” is apparently enough to get you arrested by university police and thrown out of the State University of New York at New Paltz. According to a July 7, 2006, Inside Higher Ed article, Corinna Caracci, SUNY–New Paltz’s director of residence life, filed a police report accusing newly elected student government President Justin Holmes and Vice President R.J. Partington III of “upsetting and annoying her.”
The university found this to be sufficient grounds for harassment and gave Holmes a one-year suspension, while expelling Partington. In response to this, Holmes has created a website with a video of the incident, which appears to contradict Caracci’s allegation that she was forced into a hostile situation that would be likely to make her feel “like a terrorized single woman with no one to protect me.” (Take a look at the video and decide for yourself.)
In light of the existence of this video, SUNY–New Paltz might want to reconsider its decision to punish students for hurting someone’s feelings before the students carry through with their threat to sue the university for reinstatement.
Recent Articles
FIRE’s award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.
Should the First Amendment protect hate speech?
In America, hate speech is generally protected by the First Amendment. But should it be? Today's guest is out with a new book, "." W. Wat Hopkins is emeritus professor of communication at Virginia Tech, where he taught communication law and...
Here’s what students need to know about protesting on campus right now
As Israel/Gaza campus protests spread nationwide, FIRE answers questions about students’ expressive rights.
Kansas takes a stand for intellectual freedom
Kansas enacts FIRE’s model Intellectual Freedom Protection Act, which prohibits mandatory statements on diversity, equity, and inclusion, and all other political litmus tests.
FIRE joins animal advocates, free speech groups urging Ninth Circuit to affirm ruling that allows undercover audio recording
Secret recordings are essential to news gathering, exposés, say advocates in Project Veritas case.