Freedom of Speech & Expression

FRIEDMAN v. NEW YORK, 388 U.S. 441 (1967)

Argued:
N/A
Decided:
June 12, 1967
Decided by:
Warren Court, 1966
Action:
Reversed. Petitioning party received a favorable disposition.

CASE INFO
OPINIONS
RELATED CASES
RESOURCES & COMMENTARY
CASE INFO

Advocates for Respondent
Advocates for Petitioner
OPINIONS
Concurring Opinion

No opinions found

Dissenting Opinion

John Harlan (1955-71)

388 U.S. 441 (1967)

FRIEDMAN
v.
NEW YORK.

 


No. 7.

Supreme Court of United States.

 


Decided June 12, 1967.

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT.Ira H. Holley and Eugene Gressman for petitioner.

Frank S. Hogan for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496, and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455, and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm.

RELATED CASES

Coming soon!

RESOURCES & COMMENTARY

Resources:

Coming soon!

Commentary:

Coming soon!

Topics: Freedom of Speech & Expression, Freedom of the Press, Obscenity, Press Freedoms

Cite this page: APA Bluebook Chicago MLA

This library is a work in progress. See an error on this page? Let us know.