Freedom of Religion

HOLT v. HOBBS, 135 S. Ct. 853 (2015)

Argued:
October 07, 2014
Decided:
January 20, 2015
Decided by:
Roberts Court, 2014
Legal Principle at Issue:
Did the Arkansas Department of Correction's grooming policy substantially burden the prisoner's free exercise of religion?
Action:
Reversed and remanded. Petitioning party received a favorable disposition.

CASE INFO
OPINIONS
RELATED CASES
RESOURCES & COMMENTARY
CASE INFO

Facts/Syllabus:
A Muslim prisoner challenged a prison policy that denied a religious accommodation to allow a prisoner to grow a half-inch beard. He brought the challenge under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) against members of the staff, including the director, of the Arkansas Department of Correction. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas adopted the position of a magistrate and dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim. He appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed. The Supreme Court reversed.
Importance of Case:
The prison's policy violated the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, which was enacted to provide a heightened protection for religious freedom already granted by the First Amendment. The policy did not further the compelling interest in proscribing prisoners from hiding contraband, was not the least restrictive way to preventing prisoners from hiding contraband, and was not the least restrictive means of preventing prisoners from disguising identities.

OPINIONS
RELATED CASES
Freedom of Religion

WATSON v. JONES, 80 U.S. 679 (1872)

Related Sub-Topic:
Free Exercise
RESOURCES & COMMENTARY

Resources:

Coming soon!

Commentary:

Coming soon!

Topics: Free Exercise, Freedom of Religion

Cite this page: APA Bluebook Chicago MLA

This library is a work in progress. See an error on this page? Let us know.