JONES v. OPELIKA, 319 U.S. 103 (1943)
- Argued:
- February 05, 1942
- Reargued:
- March 10, 1943
- Decided:
- May 03, 1943
- Decided by:
- Stone Court, 1942
- Action:
- Affirmed (includes modified). Petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition.
See Opinion tab for full case information.
Majority Opinion
Harlan Stone Owen Roberts Hugo Black Stanley Reed Felix Frankfurter William Douglas Francis Murphy Robert Jackson Wiley Rutledge
Concurring Opinion
No opinions found
Dissenting Opinion
No opinions found
319 U.S. 103
63 S.Ct. 890
87 L.Ed. 1290
Roscoe JONES, Petitioner,
v.
CITY OF OPELIKA. Lois BOWDEN and Zada Sanders, Petitioners, v. CITY OF FORT SMITH, ARKANSAS. Charles JOBIN, Appellant, v. The STATE OF ARIZONA.
Nos. 280, 314, 966.
Reargued March 10, 11, 1943.
Decided May 3, 1943.
Robert MURDOCK, Jr., Petitioner,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA (CITY OF JEANNETTE), and
seven other cases.
Nos. 280, 314, 966, 480—487.
Supreme Court of the United States
Reargued March 10, 11, 1943.
May 3, 1943
Mr. Justice REED, dissenting.
Mr. Hayden C. Covington, of Brooklyn, N.Y., for petitioners.
No appearance for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The judgments in these cases were affirmed at the October Term, 1941. 316 U.S. 584, 62 S.Ct. 1231, 86 L.Ed. 1691, 141 A.L.R. 514. Because the issues in all three cases were of the same character as those brought before us in other cases by applications for certiorari at the present term, we ordered a reargument and heard these cases together with Nos. 480-487, Murdock et al. v. Pennsylvania. For the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court in Nos. 480-487, 319 U.S. 105, 63 S.Ct. 870, 87 L.Ed. —-, decided this day, and in the dissenting opinions filed in the present cases after the argument last term, the Court is of opinion that the judgment in each case should be reversed. The judgments of this Court heretofore entered in these cases are therefore vacated, and the judgments of the state courts are reversed. So ordered.
Reversed.
For dissenting opinions of Mr. Justice REED, and Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER, see 319 U.S. 105, 63 S.Ct. 891.
AMERICAN TRADITION PARTNERSHIP, INC., FKA WESTERN TRADITION PARTNERSHIP, INC., et al. v. STEVE BULLOCK, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MONTANA, et al., (2012)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
SORRELL, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VERMONT, et al. v. IMS HEALTH INC. ET AL, 564 U.S. 552 (2011)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
MILAVETZ, GALLOP & MILAVETZ, P. A., et al. v. UNITED STATES, 559 U.S. 229 (2010)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
MIKE JOHANNS, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE, et al., v. LIVESTOCK MARKETING ASSOCIATION et al., 544 U.S. 550 (2005)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
TOMMY G. THOMPSON, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al. v. WESTERN STATES MEDICAL CENTER et al., 535 U.S. 357 (2002)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
UNITED STATES AND DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE v. UNITED FOODS, INC., 533 U.S. 405 (2001)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT v. UNITED REPORTING PUBLISHING CORPORATION, 528 U.S. 32 (1999)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
GREATER NEW ORLEANS BROADCASTING ASSOCIATION, INC., ETC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al., 527 U.S. 173 (1999)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
DAN GLICKMAN, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE v. WILEMAN BROTHERS & ELLIOTT, INC., et al., 521 U.S. 457 (1997)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
44 LIQUORMART, INC. AND PEOPLES SUPER LIQUOR STORES, INC. v. RHODE ISLAND AND RHODE ISLAND LIQUOR STORES ASSOCIATION, 517 U.S. 484 (1996)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
FLORIDA BAR v. WENT FOR IT, INC., AND JOHN T. BLAKELY, 515 U.S. 618 (1995)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
ROBERT E. RUBIN, SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY v. COORS BREWING COMPANY, 514 U.S. 476 (1995)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
SILVIA S. IBANEZ v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY, 512 U.S. 136 (1994)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
UNITED STATES AND FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION v. EDGE BROADCASTING COMPANY T/A POWER 94, 509 U.S. 418 (1993)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
FRED H. EDENFIELD, et al. v. SCOTT FANE, 507 U.S. 761 (1993)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
CITY OF CINCINNATI v. DISCOVERY NETWORK, INC., et al., 507 U.S. 410 (1993)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
DOMINIC P. GENTILE v. STATE BAR OF NEVADA, 501 U.S. 1030 (1991)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
LEATHERS, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUES OF ARKANSAS v. MEDLOCK et al., 499 U.S. 439 (1991)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Taxes on Expression
GARY E. PEEL v. ATTORNEY REGISTRATION AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION OF ILLINOIS, 496 U.S. 91 (1990)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK et al. v. FOX et al., 492 U.S. 469 (1989)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
HERNANDEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 490 U.S. 680 (1989)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Taxes on Expression
SHAPERO v. KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, 486 U.S. 466 (1988)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
SAN FRANCISCO ARTS & ATHLETICS, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES OLYMPIC COMMITTEE et al., 483 U.S. 522 (1987)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
O’CONNOR et ux. v. UNITED STATES, 479 U.S. 27 (1986)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Taxes on Expression
POSADAS DE PUERTO RICO ASSOCIATES, DBA CONDADO HOLIDAY INN v. TOURISM COMPANY OF PUERTO RICO et al., 478 U.S. 328 (1986)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA et al., 475 U.S. 1 (1986)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
ZAUDERER v. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO, 471 U.S. 626 (1985)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
BOLGER et al. v. YOUNGS DRUG PRODUCTS CORP., 463 U.S. 60 (1983)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
MINNEAPOLIS STAR & TRIBUNE CO. v. MINNESOTA COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE, 460 U.S. 575 (1983)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Taxes on Expression
VILLAGE OF HOFFMAN ESTATES et al. v. THE FLIPSIDE, HOFFMAN ESTATES, INC., 455 U.S. 489 (1982)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
in re R. M. J., 455 U.S. 191 (1982)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
METROMEDIA, INC., et al. v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., 453 U.S. 490 (1981)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
CENTRAL HUDSON GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF NEW YORK, 447 U.S. 557 (1980)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF NEW YORK, 447 U.S. 530 (1980)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
VILLAGE OF SCHAUMBURG v. CITIZENS FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT et al., 444 U.S. 620 (1980)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
FRIEDMAN et al. v. ROGERS et al., 440 U.S. 1 (1979)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
In re PRIMUS, 436 U.S. 412 (1978)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
OHRALIK v. OHIO STATE BAR ASSN., 436 U.S. 447 (1978)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
BATES et al. v. STATE BAR OF ARIZONA, 433 U.S. 350 (1977)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
CAREY, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK, et al. v. POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL et al., 431 U.S. 678 (1977)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
LINMARK ASSOCIATES, INC., et al. v. TOWNSHIP OF WILLINGBORO et al., 431 U.S. 85 (1977)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY et al. v. VIRGINIA CITIZENS CONSUMER COUNCIL, INC., et al., 425 U.S. 748 (1976)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
BIGELOW v. VIRGINIA, 421 U.S. 809 (1975)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
UNITED STATES v. AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE et al., 419 U.S. 7 (1974)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Taxes on Expression
PITTSBURGH PRESS CO. v. PITTSBURGH COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS et al., 413 U.S. 376 (1973)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
COLUMBIA BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. v. DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, 412 U.S. 94 (1973)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
CAMMARANO et ux. v. UNITED STATES, 358 U.S. 498 (1959)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
SPEISER v. RANDALL, ASSESSOR OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, 357 U.S. 513 (1958)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Taxes on Expression
BREARD v. ALEXANDRIA, 341 U.S. 622 (1951)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
RAILWAY EXPRESS AGENCY, INC. ET AL. v. NEW YORK, 336 U.S. 106 (1949)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
DONALDSON, POSTMASTER GENERAL, v. READ MAGAZINE, INC. ET AL., 333 U.S. 178 (1948)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
FOLLETT v. TOWN OF MCCORMICK, 321 U.S. 573 (1944)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Taxes on Expression
MURDOCK v. PENNSYLVANIA (CITY OF JEANNETTE), 319 U.S. 105 (1943)
- Related Sub-Topics:
- Commercial Speech, Taxes on Expression
DOUGLAS et al. v. CITY OF JEANNETTE et al., 319 U.S. 157 (1943)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Taxes on Expression
JONES v. OPELIKA, 316 U.S. 584 (1942)
- Lower Court Ruling:
- Overruled
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Taxes on Expression
VALENTINE, POLICE COMMISSIONER OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, v. CHRESTENSEN, 316 U.S. 52 (1942)
- Lower Court Ruling:
- Overruled
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
LOVELL v. CITY OF GRIFFIN, 303 U.S. 444 (1938)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
HALTER v. NEBRASKA, 205 U.S. 34 (1907)
- Related Sub-Topic:
- Commercial Speech
Resources:
Coming soon!
Commentary:
Coming soon!
Topics: Commercial Speech, Freedom of Religion, Freedom of Speech & Expression, Taxes on Expression
Cite this page: APA Bluebook Chicago MLA
This library is a work in progress. See an error on this page? Let us know.
Follow FIRE