Case Overview

Legal Principle at Issue

Do Vermonts mandatory limits on candidate expenditures violate the First Amendment as interpreted in Buckley v. Valeo (1976)?

Action

Affirmed (includes modified). Petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition.

Cite this page

  • SORRELL v. IMS HEALTH INC.. (n.d.). First Amendment Library. Retrieved July 12, 2025, from https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/sorrell-v-ims-health-inc
  • SORRELL v. IMS HEALTH INC., First Amendment Library, https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/sorrell-v-ims-health-inc (last visited 12 Jul. 2025).
  • Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). "SORRELL v. IMS HEALTH INC.." Oyez. https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/sorrell-v-ims-health-inc (accessed July 12, 2025).
  • "SORRELL v. IMS HEALTH INC.." First Amendment Library. Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), n.d. 12 Jul. 2025, www.thefire.org/supreme-court/sorrell-v-ims-health-inc.
Share