Case Overview

Legal Principle at Issue

Do Vermonts mandatory limits on candidate expenditures violate the First Amendment as interpreted in Buckley v. Valeo (1976)?

Action

Affirmed (includes modified). Petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition.

Cite this page

  • SORRELL v. IMS HEALTH INC.. (n.d.). First Amendment Library. Retrieved August 6, 2025, from https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/sorrell-v-ims-health-inc
  • SORRELL v. IMS HEALTH INC., First Amendment Library, https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/sorrell-v-ims-health-inc (last visited 6 Aug. 2025).
  • Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). "SORRELL v. IMS HEALTH INC.." Oyez. https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/sorrell-v-ims-health-inc (accessed August 6, 2025).
  • "SORRELL v. IMS HEALTH INC.." First Amendment Library. Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), n.d. 6 Aug. 2025, www.thefire.org/supreme-court/sorrell-v-ims-health-inc.
Share