Table of Contents
Dreams of an ‘Apolitical’ Classroom
In the March 18, 2005, issue of The Chronicle of Higher Education, Naomi Schaefer Riley, author of God on the Quad: How Religious Colleges and the Missionary Generation Are Changing America, published the interesting and insightful piece “Conservatives, Too, Are Politicizing Campuses” (subscription required). In the article she points out that the ideal classroom may be the “apolitical” one, where professors choose to not focus on their own politics in favor of encouraging students to develop ideas of their own and students are free to debate their ideas on the merits and regardless of the partisan label attached to them. As we have often pointed out, the goal of fighting illiberal policies on campus is not so that a new oppressive orthodoxy can replace the old one, but rather the goal is to reach the ideal of the “chaotic paradise” where intellectual and philosophical battles are welcomed, savored, and celebrated, not suppressed. We may be daydreaming, but it’s nice to know that there are people out there like Schafer Riley who share our daydreams.
Recent Articles
FIRE’s award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.
LAWSUIT: Historian fights back after Pennsylvania state senator sues him for criticizing book
Sen. Doug Mastriano’s lawsuit is a textbook “SLAPP” case, in which powerful individuals sue their critics into silence through long, costly litigation.
FIRE statement on California’s Defending Democracy from Deepfake Deception Act
AB 2655 threatens Californians’ right to speak freely about politics in their state.
House passes historic legislation protecting free speech on college campuses
Public colleges must do more to protect the First Amendment rights of students and faculty on campus, according to a new bill in the House.
Kamala Harris comedy roast denied funding by University of South Carolina student senate
Despite pushback, the student senate denied funding to the student group Uncensored America for the event in a blatant example of viewpoint discrimination.