Table of Contents
FIRE Reminds NYU That Suppression of Speech Won’t Fly
Last March, NYU was in the news for banning the display of the Mohammed cartoons from a panel discussing those very cartoons. NYU spokesman John Beckman ludicrously defended NYU’s censorship by likening the cartoons to a fatal disease, stating, “Realistically, one can have a discussion on smallpox without actually handing out the live virus to the audience.”
NYU President John Sexton never responded to FIRE’s April letter asking that he renounce NYU’s illiberal actions and promise to uphold NYU’s policies and commitments to free speech. On Friday, FIRE sent a letter to NYU’s Board of Trustees to inform them about NYU’s dabblings in censorship and failure to rectify those mistakes. That letter stated:
[W]hile NYU is not directly bound by the U.S. Constitution, its policies show great respect for the principles enshrined in the First Amendment. One cannot claim to value free speech but then take the side of angry censors. I believe this issue is serious enough to warrant a response from NYU, but we have received no response whatsoever.…Unless President Sexton addresses NYU’s failure to defend the fundamental principles of a free university in this case, NYU will be haunted by the legacy of this incident for years to come. FIRE urges you and the members of the NYU Board of Trustees to … decide for yourselves whether NYU’s administrators have held themselves to the professional standards that the trustees of NYU have a right to expect. We urge you to contact President Sexton with your opinions. Free speech needs to be defended not only when it is convenient to do so, but also in times of greatest controversy. A university president should understand that.
FIRE hopes that the trustees will ensure that NYU does not repeat these past errors.
Recent Articles
FIRE’s award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Purdue fails its own test on institutional neutrality
Purdue claimed neutrality — until a student paper challenged it. But pressuring the paper to change its name is not neutrality. It’s censorship.

Extortion in plain sight
A baseless lawsuit, FCC strong-arming, an $8 billion merger — and free speech hanging in the balance. Robert Corn-Revere exposes the political pressure campaign that forced CBS to settle a case that never should’ve been filed.

Jailed for basic journalism, Texas reporter takes free speech fight to Supreme Court
When local officials tried to turn journalism into a crime, Priscilla Villarreal refused to back down. Arrested for asking questions, now with FIRE at her side, she’s taking her fight all the way to the Supreme Court.

Speech is not a crime — even if it complicates ICE’s job
Aaron Terr explains why alerting others to law enforcement activity, or reporting on it, is protected by the First Amendment.