Freedom of Speech & Expression
SORRELL, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VERMONT, et al. v. IMS HEALTH INC. ET AL, 564 U.S. 552 (2011)
- April 26, 2011
- June 23, 2011
- Decided by:
- Roberts Court, 2010
- Legal Principle at Issue:
- Do Vermonts mandatory limits on candidate expenditures violate the First Amendment as interpreted in Buckley v. Valeo (1976)?
- Affirmed (includes modified). Petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition.
No opinions found
This library is a work in progress. See an error on this page? Let us know.