NOTE: The article excerpted on this page is from an outside publication and is posted on FIRE's website because it references FIRE's work. The viewpoints expressed in this article do not necessarily represent FIRE's positions.
As college football enters its third week, the Southeastern Conference continues its stranglehold on the national polls, claiming three of the top seven spots in two separate polls.
But it turns out, the SEC has some other rankings to brag about this week.
The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) released its second annual list of Best Colleges for Free Speech, and FIRE's top seven list includes, you guessed it, three SEC universities.
Mississippi State University, the University of Mississippi and the University of Tennessee-Knoxville may not be the poster children for SEC football, but they are at the top when it comes to the First Amendment.
The schools took spots three (Ole Miss), four (MSU) and five (Tennessee) among nearly 400 institutions nationwide.
FIRE granted the "green light" to each of the seven universities, meaning the schools' policies are in accordance with federal definitions and do not pose any serious threat to free speech on campus.
The schools selected have also avoided any serious censorship for a number of consecutive years.
Even though both Ole Miss and MSU are just now making an appearance on the rankings, officials from both schools say free speech has been a priority for years.
Ole Miss and MSU may have cracked the rankings earlier were it not for some of the wording in some of their policies.
Sparky Reardon, dean of students at Ole Miss, said this was case in Oxford prior to the beginning of the spring semester, when the university found out it had been given the "green light."
"The only thing that was holding us back was the wording in our policy," Reardon said. "That is the case with a lot of people, too. It's just not understanding the words and expressions regarding free speech."
Similar issues were holding MSU back, according to Dean of Students Thomas Bourgeois.
"A lot of time your intent is good, but at the same time it may be implemented or written poorly," he said. "I just think our policy didn't match our practice."
Bourgeois said MSU had issues with the word "offensive" in their previous policy (which they revised over the past year), but changed the policy to defer to Supreme Court rulings on words like "obscene."
"Being offensive isn't going against the First Amendment," he said. "You know, there are pretty high standards that say what obscene is and what harassment is. We just changed that to reflect the federal definition and cleared up the language...