Table of Contents
Dreams of an ‘Apolitical’ Classroom
In the March 18, 2005, issue of The Chronicle of Higher Education, Naomi Schaefer Riley, author of God on the Quad: How Religious Colleges and the Missionary Generation Are Changing America, published the interesting and insightful piece “Conservatives, Too, Are Politicizing Campuses” (subscription required). In the article she points out that the ideal classroom may be the “apolitical” one, where professors choose to not focus on their own politics in favor of encouraging students to develop ideas of their own and students are free to debate their ideas on the merits and regardless of the partisan label attached to them. As we have often pointed out, the goal of fighting illiberal policies on campus is not so that a new oppressive orthodoxy can replace the old one, but rather the goal is to reach the ideal of the “chaotic paradise” where intellectual and philosophical battles are welcomed, savored, and celebrated, not suppressed. We may be daydreaming, but it’s nice to know that there are people out there like Schafer Riley who share our daydreams.
Recent Articles
FIRE’s award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Seven free speech groups issue a call to oppose Trump’s First Amendment violations… Why aren’t there more? — First Amendment News 471
First Amendment News is a weekly blog and newsletter about free expression issues by Ronald K. L. Collins and is editorially independent from FIRE.

Charles Negy was fired over a tweet — now he's having his day in court
A judge says UCF can’t dodge a professor’s First Amendment lawsuit — meaning campus cancel culture might soon get its day in court.

FIRE and Cosmos Institute launch $1 million grant program for AI that advances truth-seeking
The $1M in grants will fund open-source AI projects that defend free thought.

UC Irvine is crusading over student doormats — and wiping its feet on the Constitution
UC Irvine is cracking down on what students can say on their doormats. Worse, they're selectively enforcing the policy and threatening those who don't comply.