Table of Contents
FIRE statement on White House denying AP Oval Office access
T. Schneider / Shutterstock.com
Punishing journalists for not adopting state-mandated terminology is an alarming attack on press freedom. That's viewpoint discrimination, and it's unconstitutional.
President Trump has the authority to change how the U.S. government refers to the Gulf. But he cannot punish a news organization for using another term. The role of our free press is to hold those in power accountable, not to act as their mouthpiece. Any government efforts to erode this fundamental freedom deserve condemnation.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from FIRE.
FIRE sues Bondi, Noem for censoring Facebook group and app reporting ICE activity
Two Midwesterners are fighting back after the platforms they created to report on public Immigration and Customs Enforcement activity were censored by government officials.
Deep dive into New York’s proposals to ban demonstrations near houses of worship
Core among the rights protected by the First Amendment is the right to demonstrate.
Iran replaced my mother’s voice with silence
For 13 years, Faraz Harsini's mother never missed her Sunday call from Tehran. Then the regime cut the lines. Now he waits in silence.
Spain considers banning teens from social media and holding tech executives criminally responsible for ‘hate speech’
Spain eyes jailing tech CEOs and banning teens from social media as global crackdowns on speech grow — from Hong Kong to Pakistan and the UK.