Table of Contents
Possible Lawsuit at Stanford
FIRE recently learned that FIRE Legal Network attorney Robert Corry, who successfully sued Stanford University for its speech code in 1994, has taken up the cause of preserving door-to-door distribution of student publications on Stanford’s campus. Stanford bans door-to-door distribution of literature unless hall residents specifically vote to endorse it, and the conservative Stanford Review, whose editors have long distributed their issues door-to-door, has joined The Stanford Progressive in objecting to the current state of affairs. Review editors have refused to abide by Stanford’s policy and are currently facing sanctions. All of this has led Corry to write to Stanford’s president threatening a lawsuit unless the ban on door-to-door distribution is overturned. His reasoning, to those uninitiated in the peculiarities of California, relies upon the Golden State’s unique Leonard Law, which requires its non-religious private universities to act as if they are bound by the First Amendment.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from FIRE.
George Mason demands pro-Palestinian student group remove video from social media, but public universities can’t do that
The university cited a vague and overbroad definition of antisemitism, as defined by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, which is now school policy.
The NO FAKES Act is a real threat to free expression
“NO FAKES” bills claim to promise deepfake fixes, but their restrictions on expression would chill news, history, art, and everyday speech.
NEW HIGH: 3/4 of Americans say free speech is headed in the wrong direction
A new poll from the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression finds that a record number of Americans now believe that freedom of speech in the country is headed in the wrong direction.