Table of Contents
What’s The Problem With Social Justice?
When FIRE criticizes institutions for assessing students based on their commitments to concepts such as “social justice,” one common question we hear is: what’s so wrong with that? Can’t everyone agree that social justice is a good thing?
The problem is that in academia, certain terms, including social justice, have become politically and ideologically loaded. Mark Bauerlein, a professor of English at Emory University, provides interesting insight into this phenomenon today on Inside Higher Ed. Bauerlein discusses how academics first propagated the notion that that language has “implicit meaning…much of it political or identity-oriented,” and yet are now falling back on the traditionally “conservative” notion that words should be taken at face value in order to defend themselves against charges of bias (such as the charge that it is inappropriate to judge people on their commitment to social justice.)
Bauerlein also notes that academics tend to issue denials when charged with bias in their use of politically-charged language. Of these people, Bauerlein asks: “Have they lived so long and so closely to ‘social justice,’ ‘social change,’…and ‘gender equality’ that they do not recognize them as loaded terms? ... By their own instruction, we should regard the widespread attention to race, gender, and social construction as emanating from a world view and signaling an ideological commitment.”
Those who do not see the danger inherent in judging people on the basis of their commitment to terms like “social justice” would do well to read Bauerlein’s thought-provoking article.
Recent Articles
FIRE’s award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.
Texas tramples First Amendment rights with police crackdown of pro-Palestinian protests
More than 50 arrested after state police storm protestors at University of Texas at Austin.
Here’s what students need to know about protesting on campus right now
As Israel/Gaza campus protests spread nationwide, FIRE answers questions about students’ expressive rights.
Kansas takes a stand for intellectual freedom
Kansas enacts FIRE’s model Intellectual Freedom Protection Act, which prohibits mandatory statements on diversity, equity, and inclusion, and all other political litmus tests.
FIRE joins animal advocates, free speech groups urging Ninth Circuit to affirm ruling that allows undercover audio recording
Secret recordings are essential to news gathering, exposés, say advocates in Project Veritas case.