There are many obvious benefits to a free press on campus.
What student press censorship looks like
The practice of prohibiting speech or writing on a subject before it is published or communicated.
It is almost always unconstitutional at public universities.
When an administrator or other official demands to review and approve the contents of a media outlet prior to publication.
It is also unconstitutional at public universities.
When student governments withhold or threaten to withhold funding because of student newspaper content.
Financially punishing a publication because of content threatens freedom of expression.
When newspapers are stolen en masse, often to prevent others from reading it.
Newspaper theft is censorship—a “heckler’s veto”—that silences expression by rendering it inaccessible.
Firing of Adviser
An indirect form of censorship that attempts to retaliate against, censor, or intimidate student journalists and the adviser by terminating a publication’s adviser.
It represents a severe threat to freedom of expression.
Fight for your rights: Get educated!
One of the most effective ways for student journalists to educate their campuses about the importance of a free press is by doing what they do best: writing!
Check out some additional resources from both FIRE and the SPLC.
Resources from FIRE
- FIRE’s Guide to Free Speech on Campus
- Poster: “5 Steps to Fight Campus Press Censorship”
- FIRE’s Skype Sessions for Student Journalists
- “Shedding Light on Student Journalism after ‘Hazelwood’,” FIRE’s Susan Kruth
- “Victory: Rutgers Will Not Punish Satirical Newspaper,” FIRE’s Peter Bonilla
- Video: U. of Alaska Fairbanks Newspaper Investigated for Nearly a Year for Protected Speech
Resources from SPLC
The Student Press Law Center is an advocate for student First Amendment rights, for freedom of online speech, and for open government on campus.