Residential Programs & Services: Statement on Diversity

Speech Code Category: Policies on Tolerance, Respect, and Civility
Last updated: August 22, 2016

[W]e will not tolerate any form of bigotry, harassment, intimidation, threat, or abuse, whether verbal or written, physical or psychological, direct or implied. … We will respond to such behavior in an appropriate manner, recognizing that education is our most powerful tool.

» Read More

Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities, and Conduct: Student Responsibilities

Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies
Last updated: August 22, 2016

Verbal abuse of another person, including the following:

a. An express or implied threat to:

(1) Interfere with an individual’s personal safety, academic efforts, employment, or participation in university-sponsored activities and that under the circumstances causes the person to have a reasonable apprehension that such harm is about to occur; or

(2) Injure that person, or damage his or her property; or

b. “Fighting words” that are spoken face-to-face as a personal insult to the listener or listeners in personally abusive language inherently likely to provoke a violent reaction by the listener or listeners to the speaker.

» Read More

The 2016-2017 Residence Hall Rules and Regulations

Speech Code Category: Policies on Tolerance, Respect, and Civility
Last updated: August 22, 2016

Writing offensive and/or inappropriate language or symbols on dry erase boards, walks, or other areas frequented by the public is prohibited.

» Read More

Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities, and Conduct: Student Rights- Right to Freedom from Harassment

Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies
Last updated: August 22, 2016

Sexual harassment is unwelcome conduct or behavior of a sexual nature. Sexual harassment includes sexual violence (see definition). Both violent and non-violent sexual harassment is prohibited. Sexual harassment can include unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors and other verbal, nonverbal, written, electronic (e.g. by e-mail, text, social media, etc.), or physical conduct of a sexual nature. Sexual harassment occurs when:

1. submission to or rejection of such conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a condition of an individual’s employment or academic standing or is used as the basis for employment decisions or for academic evaluation, grades, or advancement (quid pro quo), or when
2. such conduct is sufficiently severe, pervasive or persistent to limit or deny a person’s ability to participate in or benefit from the University’s educational programs or affects employment, creating a hostile environment.

Discriminatory harassment is defined as conduct that targets an individual based upon age, color, religion, disability, race, ethnicity, national origin, sex, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, marital status, or veteran’s status and that adversely affects a term or condition of an individual’s education, housing, or participation in a university activity; or has the purpose or effect of unreasonably creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive environment for academic pursuits, housing, or participation in university activities.

» Read More

Policy UA-03: Sexual Misconduct

Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies
Last updated: August 22, 2016

Sexual harassment is unwelcome conduct or behavior of a sexual nature. … Sexual harassment can include unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors and other verbal, nonverbal, written, electronic (e.g. by e-mail, text, social media, etc.), or physical conduct of a sexual nature. Sexual harassment occurs when: …  such conduct is sufficiently severe, pervasive or persistent to limit or deny a person’s ability to participate in or benefit from the University’s educational programs or affects employment, creating a hostile environment.

[…]

The definition of sexual harassment in this policy is meant neither to proscribe nor to inhibit discussions, in or out of the classroom, of complex, controversial, or sensitive matters, including matters involving sex, gender, sexuality, sexual orientation, sexual behavior, or gender identity or expression, when in the judgment of a reasonable person they arise for legitimate pedagogical purposes. This includes intellectual inquiry, debate, and dialogue on issues of sexual misconduct. The mere expression of views, words, symbols or thoughts that some people find offensive, does not create a hostile environment.

» Read More

Student Organization Handbook: Free Speech, Demonstrations, and Political Campaigns

Speech Code Category: Protest and Demonstration Policies
Last updated: August 22, 2016

As an institution of higher education, Indiana University is committed to the free exchange of ideas. In accordance with its responsibilities under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, Indiana University affords students, faculty, staff and visitors the right to assemble and express their opinions in public areas of the campus. The University is committed to protecting the free speech rights of students, faculty, staff and guests. Indiana University respects the Campus Community’s rights to free speech and expressive activity (such as assembling, speaking, writing, publishing and inviting speakers on any subject) within public and designated public forums, but also acts to preserve public health, safety and welfare, the normal business uses of the campus, and the rights of others to legitimately use and enjoy the campus.

…

There are numerous locations on campus available to express your views. Dunn Meadow (Assembly Grounds), outside Sample Gates, and all perimeter sidewalks maintained by the City of Bloomington are available for free speech activity. Students and citizens may want to offer a supportive or contrary opinion proximate to any campus program or activity. IU encourages civil dialogue, expression and sharing of opinions and beliefs. The following general conditions of use apply to all areas on the University campus:

• Activities may not be conducted in a manner that violates any federal, state or local law.
• Activities may not be conducted in a manner or at a time or place that is either incompatible or unreasonably interferes with the educational, research, service, or other legitimate functions of the University.
• Activities may not be conducted in a manner that violates the rules, regulations, or policies of the Indiana University Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities, and Conduct.
• Activities may not be conducted in a manner that violates applicable fire or safety regulations.
• Activities may not disrupt academic activity, block egress (i.e. block safe access to exits and entrances, hallways, sidewalks, streets etc.) or pose a threat to the personal safety of community members.
• Overnight camping is not a form of expression and, therefore, permission will not be granted to cook or live in overnight structures.

» Read More

Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities, and Conduct: Student Rights- Right to Freedom of Association, Expression, Advocacy and Publication

Speech Code Category: Advertised Commitments to Free Expression
Last updated: August 22, 2016

In accordance with the state and federal Constitution and university policy, the university recognizes the rights of all students to engage in discussion, to express thoughts and opinions, and to assemble, speak, write, publish or invite speakers on any subject without university interference or fear of university disciplinary action.

» Read More

Dean of Students: Bias Incident Reporting

Speech Code Category: Policies on Bias and Hate Speech
Last updated: August 22, 2016

Bias Incident Reporting

Indiana University encourages all Hoosiers to report their experiences of bias-based treatment. If you choose not to do so, your privacy will be respected.

What is a Bias-based Incident?

Any act of discrimination or harrassment based on:

• Race
• Ethnicity
• Religion
• Gender
• Gender Identity
• Sexual Orientation
• Disability

» Read More

Talk, Not Tear Gas: Colleges Soften Their Approach to Student Protests

November 12, 2014

By Mary Bowerman and Peter Schmidt at  The Chronicle of Higher Education When students staged a sit-in at Colgate University’s admissions office in September to protest racial intolerance on campus, perhaps the biggest news was what didn’t happen. No students were arrested or removed from the building. No one accused the campus police of heavy-handedness or administrators of trampling free-speech rights. Instead, the sit-in ended with an agreement between protesters and administrators on a 21-point plan to make the institution more welcoming for minority students. “We tried to relate to the students on a human level,” says Suzy M. Nelson, vice president and dean of […]

Due Process Legal Update: More Students’ Lawsuits Move Forward

April 11, 2016

Since OCR issued its April 4, 2011, “Dear Colleague” letter, more than 90 students have brought lawsuits alleging they were denied a fair hearing in campus sexual assault proceedings. When I wrote my first update on how these lawsuits were faring, I characterized them as an “uphill battle” for plaintiffs. While the atmosphere for these plaintiffs is still uncertain, however, the landscape has begun to change for the better. Just last month, I wrote about several new decisions that allowed accused-student plaintiffs’ claims against their universities to move forward. And in the five weeks since that writing, there have been […]

Victory: Indiana U. Dismisses Conduct Charges Based on Student’s Single Email

March 19, 2014

FIRE has successfully defended the First Amendment rights of Indiana University – Bloomington student Andrew Hsu, who was charged with “Personal Misconduct” on the basis of a single email sent to a faculty member. After FIRE intervened on Hsu’s behalf, making clear the university’s unconstitutional application of its misconduct policy to Hsu’s protected expression, the university dismissed all charges against Hsu and permanently closed his case. FIRE commends IU for taking prompt corrective action.

Student at IU Attempts to Censor Fellow Students by Vandalizing Pro-Life Display

October 1, 2013

FIRE often exposes how colleges censor students—but last week, it was a student at Indiana University who decided to engage in some vigilante censorship by vandalizing a pro-life display. According to a student account, new student organization Students for Life at IU intended to have a peaceful demonstration on campus as part of an organized protest dubbed the “Planned Parenthood Project.” The trouble reportedly began when a student approached the demonstration, removed wooden crosses meant to represent the number of abortions performed daily by Planned Parenthood from the ground, and threw them into a trash can. (The student report includes a photo of this.) […]

Faced With Hateful Protest and Calls for Censorship, Indiana U. Admins Reaffirm Free Speech Rights

September 6, 2013

There is little that will make a full-time free speech advocate prouder of his university than when the school comes out strongly in defense of free expression. Last week, in response to a protest by the campus’ registered chapter of the Traditionalist Youth Network (TYN), administrators at my alma mater, Indiana University (IU), did just that. Though reports from my old stomping ground maintain that the group’s protest outside of a local bookstore was hateful and offensive, IU Vice President of Diversity, Equity and Multicultural Affairs James Wimbush correctly noted that members of TYN have a right to publicly express […]

No Charges Filed Against Indiana University Student Arrested for Sarcastic Tweet

April 18, 2013

At the behest of Indiana University-Bloomington (IUB) Provost Lauren Robel, the Monroe County Prosecutor’s Office in Bloomington, Indiana, announced on Tuesday that it will not file felony intimidation charges against IUB student Alex Carlisle.  Carlisle turned himself in to police last week after a tweet he posted was interpreted as a death threat against Robel. The tweet, which read “Kill Provost Robel,” came alongside a retweet from the Twitter handle @IUonStrike. At first glance I could see how Carlisle’s tweet could raise some eyebrows. But for anyone who follows happenings at IUB closely, it should become quickly apparent that, in […]

FIRE Speakers on Campuses for Constitution Day

September 17, 2012

What better way is there to celebrate Constitution Day than to go see a FIRE speaker? None, I say!  Today, Associate Director of Legal and Public Advocacy Azhar Majeed will be at Indiana University-Bloomington to talk with Young Americans for Liberty (YAL). The YAL chapter is holding a free speech wall event, and Azhar will be speaking afterwards in Ballantine Hall, room 005 at 7:00 p.m. Those of you in or near Chapel Hill, North Carolina can also catch a FIRE speaker tonight. Senior Vice President Robert Shibley will be delivering a lecture at University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill (UNC) […]

The Benefits of Listening to Other Views

April 19, 2012

Writing for the Indiana Daily Student, Indiana University (IU) student and former FIRE intern Nico Perrino comments on a recent episode in which IU students heckled a campus speaker, Pastor Douglas Wilson, and prevented others from hearing him speak. The students evidently found his views so noxious that they were deemed unfit for airing at all on IU’s campus. This mob censorship seems to have been, as Nico puts it, “prejudice revealed by a crowd of people who have adopted a viewpoint and let it ferment for so long without going unchallenged that they regard themselves as maintaining a monopoly […]

Will IU’s ‘Free Speech Zone’ Fall Next? A Former FIRE Intern Investigates

March 1, 2012

In the Indiana Daily Student this week, former FIRE intern and senior Nico Perrino writes about free speech issues at his school, Indiana University-Bloomington (IU). His piece discusses the recent lawsuit filed by students at the University of Cincinnati challenging that campus’s restrictive “Free Speech Zone.” As Nico points out, IU has similar restrictions on how students can use public spaces on campus, limiting “free speech” to just two areas on campus and spontaneous events to just one. He writes compellingly about the confusion sown by contradictory and unevenly enforced policies: While it might seem like IU does not always […]

IU Students Advocating for Speech Code Reform Profiled in ‘Indiana Daily Student’

September 16, 2011

In the Indiana Daily Student this week, reporter Bailey Loosemore chronicles the ongoing efforts of Indiana University – Bloomington (IU) students to reform speech codes on their campus. Nico Perrino, an IU senior and former FIRE intern, started a committee with three other students last fall to challenge restrictive speech codes on IU’s campus. The article explains: One IU policy lists Dunn Meadow as a spontaneous free speech zone. Another states organizations must register to use the space 24 hours in advance. Yet another policy calls for registration 10 days prior. “Policies that force you to register ahead of time […]

Indiana University Eliminates Discriminatory Funding Policy Against Religious Groups

February 28, 2011

The Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) reports today that Indiana University-Bloomington (IUB) has eliminated a policy that had prevented the Christian student group Impact Movement from receiving student activity fee funds to help pay for its attendance at a national conference. Previously, groups at IUB had been excluded from receiving funds for activities that involve “religious proselytizing” or for “sectarian events.” According to ADF’s press release: In December of last year, Impact Movement sought activity funding to send some of its members to its national conference. The university permits partial funding of conference attendance for members of registered student groups and […]

‘Indiana Daily Student’ Highlights Problems with Speech Codes at IU

February 4, 2011

Connor Caudill at the Indiana Daily Student published a column this week highlighting FIRE’s recent memo explaining problematic speech codes at Indiana University-Bloomington (IU). Caudill was surprised to learn that “[m]any of the policies at IU that govern our free speech rights as students are prohibitive.” The article explains two major problems with IU’s policies. Caudill first discusses the Code of Students Rights and Responsibilities, noting that the IU definition of acceptable speech does not pass constitutional muster and that its “civility” language is mandatory rather than aspirational. (Public universities cannot constitutionally mandate that their students be “civil” at all […]

Free Speech (in the Free Speech Zone, after Paperwork) at Indiana University

December 6, 2010

The Indiana Daily Student, a student newspaper at Indiana University-Bloomington (IU), has run an interesting series on the history of Dunn Meadow, described as “[a] right-angled triangle, 925 feet long by 407 feet wide, intersected by a natural stream,” which since 1962 has been a designated free speech area for the IU campus. Articles published throughout the week in the Daily Student have chronicled Dunn Meadow’s role in aiding the Vietnam War protesters in the 1960s, as well as the women’s and gay rights movements in recent decades. An interactive timeline shows images of various rallies, concerts, and vigils having […]

Indiana University Students Push for ‘Green Light’ FIRE Rating

August 5, 2010

After the student newspaper at Indiana University-Bloomington (IU) ran an article recently about IU’s “yellow light” speech code rating, members of the IU student government have expressed their intention to work towards reforming IU’s speech codes and earning a “green light” rating from FIRE. This is wonderful news. Murat Kacan, chief of communications for the Indiana University Student Association (IUSA), told the Indiana Daily Student that IUSA vehemently opposes any University code or rule that seeks to restrict or infringe on any student’s rights to assemble, advocacy and expression. We hold the First Amendment to be amongst our greatest rights and have no tolerance towards […]

‘Indiana Daily Student’ on FIRE’s Big Ten Spotlight Ratings

July 26, 2010

The Indiana Daily Student, the student newspaper for Indiana University-Bloomington (IU), published an article this week about the university’s yellow-light rating in Spotlight, FIRE’s speech code database. The article highlights several restrictive speech policies at IU, including the policy establishing a free speech zone. Reporter Nathan Miller quotes Samantha Harris, FIRE’s Director of Speech Code Research, who wrote that “The right to engage in spontaneous expressive activity is an important aspect of the right to free speech, and this policy is unnecessarily restrictive.” Miller also cites the preamble to IU’s Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities, and Conduct as another yellow-light […]

Johns Hopkins Still Under Fire

January 12, 2007

Even though Johns Hopkins University reduced Justin Park’s punishment and he now considers the matter resolved, the university is still taking hits in the press. Today, the Indiana Daily Student published an opinion piece criticizing Hopkins for ignoring the free speech rights of its students. Columnist Edward Delp discussed the Hopkins case and other similar incidents at neighboring schools by using FIRE’s Spotlight as a resource. He concluded by stating exactly why freedom of speech on college campuses is so important: Institutions of higher education are supposed to promote the free exchange of ideas, but nowadays there seems to be […]