School Spotlight
Washington University in St. Louis
Location:
St. Louis, Missouri
Type:
Private
Speech Code Rating
Washington University in St. Louis has been given the speech code rating Yellow. Yellow light colleges and universities are those institutions with at least one ambiguous policy that too easily encourages administrative abuse and arbitrary application.
Read more
This school has adopted the chicago statement for free speech.
Rights and Responsibilities of Resident Students
Speech Code Rating: Yellow
Speech Code Category: Policies on Tolerance, Respect, and Civility
Last updated: September 11, 2021The right to be free from fear of intimidation, physical and/or emotional harm. Read MoreDiscrimination and Harassment: Sexual Harassment
Speech Code Rating: Yellow
Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies
Last updated: September 11, 2021Sexual harassment is a form of discrimination based on sex. It may include unwelcome sexual advances or other nonconsensual conduct of a sexual nature, when … such conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an individual’s work or academic performance and creating an abusive, hostile or... Read MoreResidential Life Policies: Important Things to Know- Posting Policies and Procedures
Speech Code Rating: Yellow
Speech Code Category: Posting and Distribution Policies
Last updated: September 11, 2021Sexist or discriminatory materials are prohibited. What constitutes sexist or discriminatory materials will be left to the discretion of the Residential Life staff. Read MoreBias Report and Support System: What is a Bias Incident?
Speech Code Rating: Yellow
Speech Code Category: Policies on Bias and Hate Speech
Last updated: September 11, 2021A bias incident is any discriminatory or hurtful act that appears to be or is perceived by the victim to be motivated by race, ethnicity, age, religion, national origin, sex, disability, gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, veteran status or socioeconomic status. To be considered an incident, the act i... Read MoreAdvertising and Promotions
Speech Code Rating: Yellow
Speech Code Category: Posting and Distribution Policies
Last updated: September 11, 2021Posting may not make any references to alcoholic beverages or other drugs. Sexist and discriminatory materials are not allowed. Read MoreDemonstrations and Disruption
Speech Code Rating: Green
Speech Code Category: Advertised Commitments to Free Expression
Last updated: September 11, 2021In pursuit of its mission to promote teaching and learning, Washington University in St. Louis encourages students, faculty and staff to be bold, independent and creative thinkers. Fundamental to this process is the creation of an environment that respects the rights of all members of the university community to exp... Read MoreUniversity Student Conduct Code: General Principles
Speech Code Rating: Green
Speech Code Category: Advertised Commitments to Free Expression
Last updated: September 11, 2021These community standards and expectations are intended to foster an environment conducive to learning and inquiry. Freedom of thought and expression is essential to the University’s academic mission. Respect for different points of view is essential. Nothing in this Code should be construed to limit the free and op... Read MoreDiscrimination and Harassment: Conduct Prohibited By Title IX
Speech Code Rating: Green
Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies
Last updated: September 11, 2021Title IX prohibits certain forms of sexual harassment, specifically conduct on the basis of sex that that satisfies one or more of the following (collectively “Prohibited Conduct”): … Unwelcome conduct by a University student or employee that, in the view of a reasonable person, is so severe, pervasive, and ob... Read MoreUniversity Student Conduct Code: Offenses
Speech Code Rating: Green
Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies
Last updated: September 11, 2021Stalking, hazing, engaging in domestic, dating, or interpersonal violence, or any other conduct which harasses, threatens, or endangers the safety or health of, any member of the University community or visitor to the University. Read MoreDiscrimination and Harassment: Harassment
Speech Code Rating: Green
Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies
Last updated: September 11, 2021Harassment is a form of discrimination. It is generally defined as unwelcome conduct, on or off campus, that is based on race, color, national origin, age, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, veteran status, disability or genetic information, that (1) is subjectively and objectively off... Read MoreResidential Life Policies and Procedures: Harassment
Speech Code Rating: Green
Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies
Last updated: September 11, 2021Washington University advocates a positive and safe environment for its students, faculty, and staff and does not tolerate harassment of any kind. Harassment is defined as unwelcome and objectively offensive conduct that (a) has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an individual’s work or education... Read More
Policies are rated on their inclusion of 10 due process safeguards. Each policy may receive 2 points for fully including that safeguard, 1 point for partial inclusion, and 0 points for no meaningful inclusion. Most, but not all, institutions have separate policies for sexual misconduct and all other misconduct. See FIRE’s Spotlight on Due Process report for more information.
Grades
FIRE surveyed roughly 37,000 students at 154 colleges and universities about the climate for free speech at their institutions. In 2021, FIRE released rankings of those schools, based on a number of factors, including openness, tolerance, self-expression, administrative support for free speech, and campus policies, scoring overall speech climate on a scale from 0-100. See the full report on FIRE’s 2021 College Free Speech Rankings for more information.
Rankings / out of 154 colleges surveyed |
|
| Overall Ranking | 46 |
| Ideological Diversity | 136 |
Overall / out of a top score of 100 |
|
| Overall Score | 60.41 |
| Openness | 10.08 |
| Tolerance (Liberals) | 11.34 |
| Tolerance (Conservatives) | 7.58 |
| Administrative Support | 6.39 |
| Comfort | 15.84 |
| Disruptive Conduct | 9.19 |
| Speech Code | YELLOW |
Washington University: Mandatory University Viewpoint
September 10, 2002
The Student Bar Association (SBA) at Washington University School of Law voted 27-6, with 4 abstentions, to recognize Law Students Pro-Life. This vote overturned two earlier decisions that denied recognition to Law Students Pro-Life, the critical first vote having been 27-10-1 against the group. In a September 9, 2002 letter of rejection to Law Students… Read more
20 years later, 9/11 still prompts protests and calls for censorship on campus
September 16, 2021
Correction (Sept. 21, 2021): After an investigation, University of Virginia campus police said the flags were likely blown over by the wind. One of the more glaring ironies involving America’s response to the terrorist attacks on 9/11 is how the events, which were immediately and unequivocally described as assaults on freedom, also prompted demands for censorship and governmental… Read more
Speech Code Countdown: ‘U.S. News’ Top 25 College Rankings, Numbers 19-11
October 6, 2016
FIRE’s U.S. News & World Report “Best Colleges” Countdown continues today. We’re giving you a school-by-school analysis of just how well America’s “Best Colleges” do when it comes to protecting free speech on campus. Unfortunately, in today’s crop of top campuses, troubling speech codes abound. As part of FIRE’s fresh look at U.S. News’ top-ranked… Read more
Washington University in St. Louis Endorses Version of the Chicago Statement
September 12, 2016
Last week, the Washington University in St. Louis (WashU) Faculty Senate Council endorsed a statement affirming the university’s “unwavering commitment to freedom of expression and free exchange of ideas.” With this vote, WashU joins more than a dozen other institutions at which faculty or administrative bodies have adopted a version of the 2015 University of… Read more
Speech Code of the Month: Washington University in St. Louis
April 5, 2013
FIRE announces its Speech Code of the Month for April 2013: Washington University in St. Louis (WUSTL). Specifically, WUSTL’s Residence Life Policies and Procedures define “harassment” as: any behavior or conduct that is injurious, or potentially injurious to a person’s physical, emotional, or psychological well-being, as determined at the sole discretion of the University. Such… Read more
The State of Free Speech on Campus: Washington University in St. Louis
April 6, 2009
Throughout the spring semester, FIRE is drawing special attention to the state of free speech at America’s top 25 national universities (as ranked by U.S. News & World Report). Today we review policies at Washington University in St. Louis (WUSTL), which FIRE has given a red-light rating for maintaining policies that clearly and substantially restrict… Read more
This Month in FIRE History: Victory for Freedom of Conscience at Citrus College; Coerced Student Anti-War Letters Repudiated by Administration
March 13, 2009
As we at FIRE often say, as dangerous as it is to tell citizens what they can and cannot say, it is far worse to tell them what they must say and, worse still—what they must believe. Unfortunately, we have far too many examples of colleges doing exactly that. In February of 2003, Citrus College… Read more
This Month in FIRE History: Victory for Conscience and Legal Equality at Washington University, Saint Louis
October 16, 2006
Four years ago this month, Washington University School of Law’s Student Bar Association (SBA) voted to recognize the student group Law Students Pro-Life. The October 14, 2002, vote overturned two earlier decisions that denied recognition to Law Students Pro-Life, ostensibly on the grounds that the group’s mission was too narrow because it did not have… Read more
RIC Is Not the Only One
February 24, 2005
A FIRE supporter has written us and noted that forced lobbying is “quite common, and apparently accepted, in Social Work schools.” He goes on to say: At Washington University Social Work students also engaged in school-directed lobbying of the state legislature on behalf of University-approved positions as part of a course for credit. Since Washington… Read more
Open Letter From the ACLU and FIRE
October 11, 2002
An Open Letter from the American Civil Liberties Union of Eastern Missouri and the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education to the Student Bar Association, Washington University School of Law October 11, 2002 Dear Members of the Student Bar Association, We were both surprised and profoundly disappointed to learn of your most recent meeting, at… Read more
Law School Dean Joel Seligman’s Response to Critics
October 10, 2002
From: Marjorie Anderson [mailto:manderson@wulaw.wustl.edu] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 2:59 PM To: rz[…] Subject: Re: Say It Isn’t So! Due to the overwhelming number of emails, I am helping Dean Seligman answer all incoming mail. In response to your email, Dean Seligman replies: “Thank you for your recent email. The SBA and the ProLife students… Read more
Double Standard at Washington University, Saint Louis
October 9, 2002
ST. LOUIS, MO—Washington University in Saint Louis, under Chancellor Mark Stephen Wrighton and Law School Dean Joel Seligman, knowingly has permitted an official University agency to deny recognition of a student organization because of the group’s refusal to adopt the University’s political view of the group’s moral mission. “Washington University’s chancellor has condoned intolerable restrictions… Read more
FIRE’s letter to WUSL Chancellor Mark Stephen Wrighton
September 30, 2002
September 30, 2002 Mark Stephen Wrighton Chancellor, Washington University in St. Louis Chancellor’s Office, Box 1192 One Brookings Drive St. Louis, MO 63130 Dear Chancellor Wrighton, As you can see from our directors and board of advisors, FIRE unites civil rights and civil liberties leaders, scholars, journalists, and public intellectuals across the political and ideological… Read more
SBA President Elliott Friedman’s Letter to Law Students Pro-Life
September 10, 2002
—–Original Message—– From: Elliott Friedman [mailto:emfriedm@wulaw.wustl.edu] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 12:06 AM To: Jordan Siverd Subject: Law Students ProLife Jordan, By a vote of 27-10-1, Law Students ProLife did not pass approval of the Student Bar Association at Washington University School of Law to be considered an active student organization. The representatives of SBA… Read more