PAUL SCHENCK AND DWIGHT SAUNDERS v. PRO-CHOICE NETWORK OF WESTERN NEW YORK et al.
Supreme Court Cases
519 U.S. 357 (1997)
Case Overview
Action
Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part and remanded. Petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition.
Cite this page
- PAUL SCHENCK AND DWIGHT SAUNDERS v. PRO-CHOICE NETWORK OF WESTERN NEW YORK et al.. (n.d.). First Amendment Library. Retrieved June 29, 2025, from https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/paul-schenck-and-dwight-saunders-v-pro-choice-network-western-new-york-et-al
- PAUL SCHENCK AND DWIGHT SAUNDERS v. PRO-CHOICE NETWORK OF WESTERN NEW YORK et al., First Amendment Library, https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/paul-schenck-and-dwight-saunders-v-pro-choice-network-western-new-york-et-al (last visited 29 Jun. 2025).
- Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). "PAUL SCHENCK AND DWIGHT SAUNDERS v. PRO-CHOICE NETWORK OF WESTERN NEW YORK et al.." Oyez. https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/paul-schenck-and-dwight-saunders-v-pro-choice-network-western-new-york-et-al (accessed June 29, 2025).
- "PAUL SCHENCK AND DWIGHT SAUNDERS v. PRO-CHOICE NETWORK OF WESTERN NEW YORK et al.." First Amendment Library. Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), n.d. 29 Jun. 2025, www.thefire.org/supreme-court/paul-schenck-and-dwight-saunders-v-pro-choice-network-western-new-york-et-al.