Table of Contents
FIRE Continues to Follow Dave Barry Incident at Marquette
FIRE continues to follow the case of Stuart Ditsler, the graduate student at Marquette University who was forced to remove an innocuous political quote by humorist Dave Barry from his office door. Although the Marquette administration claimed that the situation was resolved within the philosophy department, Ditsler told FIRE he was never notified of this alleged resolution. So the question remains: are students and faculty now permitted to post materials on their office doors at Marquette?
FIRE wrote to Marquette a second time, hoping to clarify the university’s position and establish a firm commitment to free speech on campus. Our letter again expressed concern over an e-mail sent to Ditsler from Philosophy Department Chair James South, which stated that the philosophy department is not a “free speech zone.” The practice of posting materials on doors, however, should be especially protected in a philosophy department—a department whose website maintains that it is dedicated to “the pursuit of truth” and that “philosophy provides a principal forum for the serious discussion of the basic questions of life.” How can philosophy students and faculty at Marquette discuss the basic questions of life if they are unsure that their expressions will be allowed? Freedom to express one’s opinions and beliefs is fundamental to such a dialogue.
FIRE is waiting for a response to its most recent letter to Marquette. We will continue to keep you posted on our progress there.
Recent Articles
FIRE’s award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

All that glitters is not gold: A brief history of efforts to rebrand social media censorship
Lawmakers are rebranding online speech regulations as child safety or consumer protection, but the First Amendment isn’t fooled. This piece unpacks the censorship hiding behind the spin.

Missouri governor signs legislation securing students’ rights to freely associate on campus
A new law protects campus groups’ freedom to set their own membership rules — affirming students don’t leave the First Amendment at the campus gate.

Purdue fails its own test on institutional neutrality
Purdue claimed neutrality — until a student paper challenged it. But pressuring the paper to change its name is not neutrality. It’s censorship.

Extortion in plain sight
A baseless lawsuit, FCC strong-arming, an $8 billion merger — and free speech hanging in the balance. Robert Corn-Revere exposes the political pressure campaign that forced CBS to settle a case that never should’ve been filed.