Table of Contents
The Good, the Bad, and the Just Plain Silly
As a free speech organization, we see pretty much every type of censorship out there. People are frequently censored at colleges and universities for engaging in controversial political speech. Other times, people are censored for engaging in speech that is crude and repugnant, but that is wholly protected. And then there are times that people seem to be censored for no reason at all. Today’s case at Marquette University is one of those instances. In the spirit of levity, here are a few more of the silliest instances of censorship we’ve seen here at FIRE:
- Gonzaga University tried to punish students for engaging in “hate speech” for posting a flyer advertising a speech by the author of the book Why the Left Hates America. Gonzaga administrators reasoned that because the flyer contained the word “hate,” it constituted “hate speech.”
- The University of New Hampshire charged a student with “harassment” and “disorderly conduct” for posting a flyer in his dorm elevators joking that women who want to lose the ‘Freshman 15’ should take the stairs instead of the elevator. The flyer was merely intended to make light of the student’s frustration with people who delay the elevator by taking it for just one or two floors instead of taking the stairs.
- The University of Central Florida attempted to punish a student for calling a student government candidate a “jerk and a fool” on the popular college website Facebook.com.
- Indian River Community College banned a student group from showing The Passion of the Christ because it was rated R, while at the same time allowing the performance of a skit entitled “F*cking for Jesus.”
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from FIRE.
VICTORY: Court vindicates professor investigated for parodying university’s ‘land acknowledgment’ on syllabus
Ninth Circuit rules UW violated the First Amendment by punishing a professor for putting a satirical land acknowledgment on his syllabus.
Can the government ban controversial public holiday displays?
If the government invites holiday displays, it can’t ban the ones it dislikes. Open the forum, lose the veto — even for Satanic statues.
DOJ plan to target ‘domestic terrorists’ risks chilling speech
DOJ plans to target “domestic terrorists” blur crime and ideology, revive McCarthy-era tactics, and risk chilling protected political speech.
‘Let them sue’: Iowa lawmakers scoffed at First Amendment in wake of Charlie Kirk shooting, records show
Iowa lawmakers urged ISU to punish speech about Charlie Kirk’s killing, shrugging off lawsuits and betting taxpayer money against the First Amendment.