- For the second year in a row, FIRE documented more than 100 targeting incidents against scholars for ideological reasons
- Targeting incidents are up from 30 in 2015
- Over two-thirds of incidents came from the left of the scholar
- More than 60% of targeting attempts resulted in some type of sanction, including investigation, suspension, or termination
PHILADELPHIA, March 2, 2022 — A new report from the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education reveals that, for the second year in a row, there were more than one hundred targeting incidents against American scholars for their protected speech.
“Scholars Under Fire: 2021 Year in Review” documents last year’s attempts to penalize scholars for speech and research that, while often controversial, is protected by the First Amendment. There were 111 attempts to target scholars for their speech in 2021, all of which have been added to FIRE’s Scholars Under Fire Database. This reflects a dramatic increase in recent years: FIRE found only 30 attacks against scholars in 2015, the first year that FIRE documented such incidents.
“Even one attack on free speech is one too many,” said FIRE Research Fellow Komi German, one of the report’s authors. “Our colleges should be built on the foundation that differences of opinion should give rise to debate and discussion — not sanctions and firings. If you asked someone which country had 111 scholars targeted in 2021, they might guess an authoritarian regime like China or Russia, not a democratic nation like the United States.”
Other notable findings from the report include:
- More than 60% of targeting incidents resulted in some form of sanction being leveled against the scholar, including 28 investigations, 18 suspensions, and 14 terminations.
- Almost 70% of the incidents came from individuals and groups to the political left of the scholar, compared to 30% that came from the right of the scholar.
- Targeting incidents occurred most often in the disciplines of law, English, political science, and medicine.
- Scholars were most often targeted for comments made in the classroom.
- As in previous years, the topic of race was more likely than any other topic to spark a targeting incident.
The report also highlights 10 of the worst targeting incidents of 2021, as well as the most egregious and the most laudable administrative responses to controversial speech. The worst incidents include a professor who landed in hot water after showing the 1965 film version of “Othello,” a professor who was terminated after he accidentally confused the names of two black students, and a professor who was fired for criticizing the university’s handling of sexual abuse scandals.
The First Amendment protects scholars at public institutions — and those institutions cannot legally punish scholars for the expression in the report (though they often do). Private institutions, though not directly bound by the First Amendment, often make institutional promises of free speech and academic freedom. FIRE advocates for targeted faculty at both types of institutions, while FIRE’s Faculty Legal Defense Fund provides “early responder” legal representation for faculty at public colleges and universities.
“We hope to see the day that our defense fund becomes obsolete,” said German. “That would mean that college administrators are finally respecting their faculty members’ rights. But that won’t happen in 2022 — this year’s targeting incidents are on pace to exceed last year’s. Until all scholars feel safe to air their views, we’ll keep defending them from illiberal attacks.”
The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to defending and sustaining the individual rights of students and faculty members at America’s colleges and universities. These rights include freedom of speech, freedom of association, due process, legal equality, religious liberty, and sanctity of conscience — the essential qualities of liberty.
Katie Kortepeter, Media Relations Associate, FIRE: 215-717-3473; email@example.com
Writer and academic Yascha Mounk argues that a new set of ideas about race, gender, and sexual orientation have overtaken society, giving rise to a rigid focus on identity in our national debate. In his new book, "," Yascha seeks to take these...