BATES et al. v. STATE BAR OF ARIZONA
Supreme Court Cases
433 U.S. 350 (1977)
Case Overview
Legal Principle at Issue
Whether an Arizona rule that restricts attorney advertising violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments.
Action
Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part. Petitioning party received a favorable disposition.
Advocated for Respondent
- Daniel M. Friedman View all cases
Advocated for Petitioner
- William C. Canby Jr. View all cases
Cite this page
- BATES et al. v. STATE BAR OF ARIZONA. (n.d.). First Amendment Library. Retrieved July 4, 2025, from https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/bates-et-al-v-state-bar-arizona
- BATES et al. v. STATE BAR OF ARIZONA, First Amendment Library, https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/bates-et-al-v-state-bar-arizona (last visited 4 Jul. 2025).
- Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). "BATES et al. v. STATE BAR OF ARIZONA." Oyez. https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/bates-et-al-v-state-bar-arizona (accessed July 4, 2025).
- "BATES et al. v. STATE BAR OF ARIZONA." First Amendment Library. Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), n.d. 4 Jul. 2025, www.thefire.org/supreme-court/bates-et-al-v-state-bar-arizona.