Case Overview

Legal Principle at Issue

Whether an Arizona rule that restricts attorney advertising violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments.

Action

Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part. Petitioning party received a favorable disposition.

Cite this page

  • BATES et al. v. STATE BAR OF ARIZONA. (n.d.). First Amendment Library. Retrieved July 4, 2025, from https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/bates-et-al-v-state-bar-arizona
  • BATES et al. v. STATE BAR OF ARIZONA, First Amendment Library, https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/bates-et-al-v-state-bar-arizona (last visited 4 Jul. 2025).
  • Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). "BATES et al. v. STATE BAR OF ARIZONA." Oyez. https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/bates-et-al-v-state-bar-arizona (accessed July 4, 2025).
  • "BATES et al. v. STATE BAR OF ARIZONA." First Amendment Library. Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), n.d. 4 Jul. 2025, www.thefire.org/supreme-court/bates-et-al-v-state-bar-arizona.
Share