Case Overview

Action

Affirmed (includes modified). Petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition.

Facts/Syllabus

A Minnesota statute made it unlawful "to interfere with or discourage the enlistment of men in the military or naval forces of the United States or of the State of Minnesota." The indictment charged that Gilbert, at a time and place designated in the state and with the United States being at war with the kingdom and imperial government of Germany, spoke out publicly against the draft and the nation's involvement in World War I.

Cite this page

  • GILBERT v. STATE OF MINNESOTA. (n.d.). First Amendment Library. Retrieved June 24, 2025, from https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/gilbert-v-state-minnesota
  • GILBERT v. STATE OF MINNESOTA, First Amendment Library, https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/gilbert-v-state-minnesota (last visited 24 Jun. 2025).
  • Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). "GILBERT v. STATE OF MINNESOTA." Oyez. https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/gilbert-v-state-minnesota (accessed June 24, 2025).
  • "GILBERT v. STATE OF MINNESOTA." First Amendment Library. Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), n.d. 24 Jun. 2025, www.thefire.org/supreme-court/gilbert-v-state-minnesota.
Share