Table of Contents
FIRE statement on Office for Civil Rights’ use of ‘anti-Semitism’ definition
FIRE is deeply disappointed by the decision of the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) to reopen an investigation into a 2011 complaint against Rutgers University utilizing a definition of anti-Semitism that threatens speech protected by the First Amendment. The definition’s inherent vagueness allows for the investigation and punishment of core political speech. This is an unacceptable result.
FIRE has clearly and consistently opposed the use of this problematic definition in both university policy and legislation at the state and federal level. We do so again today.
Recent Articles
FIRE’s award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.
University of Michigan has ended private surveillance contracts but the chill on free speech remains
After public outcry, UMich ditched its private spy firm — but the damage is done. Students may no longer be watched, but the chill on campus speech is alive and well.
Same old playbook, new target: AI chatbots
Lawmakers are dusting off digital censorship tactics and aiming them at AI chatbots. But whether it's code or conversation, the First Amendment still applies.
Americans worry about AI in politics — but they’re more worried about government censorship
A new FIRE poll shows nearly half of voters fear AI rules could silence dissent — and most say free speech matters more.
After Michigan State trustees told students to call professor a racist, his lawsuit is moving ahead
After a Michigan State professor called for accountability, two university trustees allegedly launched a smear campaign encouraging students to call him a racist. Now he gets his day in court.