School Spotlight
University of Minnesota – Twin Cities
Speech Code Rating
Acceptable Use of Information Technology Resources
Speech Code Rating: Yellow
Speech Code Category: Internet Usage Policies
Last updated: July 16, 2020Engage in inappropriate use, including but not limited to: Activities that violate state or federal laws, regulations, or University policies. Harassment Widespread dissemination of unsolicited and unauthorized electronic communications. … Harassment Use of University information technology resources in ways... Read MoreCommunity Behavioral Standards: Policies
Speech Code Rating: Yellow
Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies
Last updated: July 16, 202015. Disorderly Conduct Disorderly conduct within or immediately surrounding residence halls/University apartments disrupts our community and is not permitted. Residents will be responsible for guest behaviors. Behavior that causes harm, alarm, or disturbance is prohibited and further outlined below: a. Harm to Other... Read MoreUsing and Leasing University Outdoor Space: Twin Cities
Speech Code Rating: Yellow
Speech Code Category: Protest and Demonstration Policies
Last updated: July 16, 2020Assemblies Rallies, demonstrations, or other gatherings of fewer than 100 participants are allowed without a permit in the following outdoor spaces or immediately adjacent to these spaces and buildings: Coffman Memorial Union Plaza Gateway Plaza at McNamara Alumni Center Northrop Plaza St Paul Student Center Plaza ... Read MoreBoard of Regents Policy: Student Conduct Code
Speech Code Rating: Yellow
Speech Code Category: Bullying Policies
Last updated: July 16, 2020Bullying means aggressive behavior directed at another person that causes stress or harm and that is repeated over time, including but not limited to assaulting, defaming, terrorizing, making obscene gestures, or invading privacy. Read MoreBias Response and Referral Network
Speech Code Rating: Green
Speech Code Category: Policies on Bias and Hate Speech
Last updated: July 16, 2020A bias incident is an act of bigotry, harassment, or intimidation that is motivated in whole or in part by bias based on an individual’s or group’s actual or perceived race, color, creed, religion, national origin, gender, age, marital status, disability, public assistance status, veteran status, sexual orientatio... Read MoreBoard of Regents Policy: Student Conduct Code
Speech Code Rating: Green
Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies
Last updated: July 16, 2020Harm to Person. Harm to person means engaging in conduct that endangers or threatens to endanger the physical and/or mental health, safety, or welfare of another person, including, but not limited to, threatening, harassing, intimidating, or assaulting behavior. Read MoreBoard of Regents Policy: Sexual Harassment, Sexual Assault, Stalking and Relationship Violence
Speech Code Rating: Green
Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies
Last updated: July 16, 2020Sexual harassment is unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature under either of the following conditions: … When the conduct: (1) is severe, persistent, or pervasive; and (2) unreasonably interferes with an individual’s employment or educational performance or creates a work or educational environment that the... Read MoreDistribution of Temporary Information through Publications, Banners or Chalking: Campus Specific Requirements: Twin Cities
Speech Code Rating: Green
Speech Code Category: Posting and Distribution Policies
Last updated: July 16, 2020Publications may be posted on bulletin boards in University facilities expressly provided for public use. Use of departmental bulletin boards may require approval. On campus grounds, distribution by posting is prohibited except at kiosks or other areas designated for posting. Kiosks and posting area information is a... Read More
U. of Minnesota Chills Speech Via ‘Charlie Hebdo’ Flyer Investigation
May 5, 2015
After sponsoring an event focused on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo and the aftermath of the tragic attack on the publication’s staff in January, the University of Minnesota’s (UMN’s) College of Liberal Arts (CLA) was investigated by the Office of Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action (EOAA) for flyers promoting the event. The flyers featured… Read more
UNC, Halloween, and the ‘Professionalism’ Threat to the First Amendment
October 31, 2014
This being Halloween week, we’ve seen a few cautionary notices from universities warning of the potential for hurt feelings and emotional harm caused by culturally “insensitive” Halloween costumes. To cite one example, the University of Minnesota (UM) cautioned students to “keep in mind that certain Halloween costumes perpetuate racial, cultural, and gender stereotypes” and that… Read more
FIRE’s Catherine Sevcenko Speaking at University of Minnesota Law School
October 7, 2014
Students, faculty, and FIRE supporters in the Minneapolis area are invited to hear Catherine Sevcenko, FIRE’s Associate Director for Litigation, speak tomorrow, October 8, at 12:15 p.m. at the University of Minnesota Law School. Catherine will be speaking about “Why We Shouldn’t Stop Hate Speech,” with commentary by Jane Kirtley, University of Minnesota media ethics… Read more
Former Central Lakes Nursing Student Appeals First Amendment Case
August 29, 2014
Craig Keefe, a former student at Central Lakes College (CLC) in Minnesota, is appealing a U.S. district court’s dismissal of his claims that the college violated his First Amendment and due process rights when it expelled him in December 2012 for remarks he had made on Facebook.
FIRE’s Will Creeley Speaking at the University of Minnesota Law School Today
April 9, 2014
Students and FIRE supporters in the Minneapolis area are invited to hear FIRE Director of Legal and Public Advocacy Will Creeley speak at the University of Minnesota (U of M) Law School today at 12:15 p.m. in Mondale Hall, Room 229. Today’s event will also feature remarks by Professor Jane Kirtley, the Silha Professor of Media Ethics and Law at the School of Journalism and Mass Communication and Director of the Silha Center for the Study of Media Ethics and Law.
Censoring Speech? There’s an Admin for That
December 31, 2012
The Wall Street Journal this weekend featured an in-depth look at administrative bloat in the University of Minnesota system, where (as in many places in academia) the ranks of administrators are growing far more quickly than those of faculty or students. As authors Douglas Belkin and Scott Thurm write: Many of the newly hired, it… Read more
Misunderstanding ‘Harassment’
October 16, 2012
Last week, FIRE kicked off a blog series about how schools can reform problematic speech codes with a discussion of why mandating “civility“ is inconsistent with students’ right to free speech. This week, we are tackling another trouble spot for free speech: the harassment policy. As an initial matter, campus harassment policies can be divided… Read more
Amanda Tatro Dead at 31
June 26, 2012
There is tragic news from Minnesota today. Amanda Tatro, the student plaintiff in Tatro v. University of Minnesota (in which FIRE filed an amici curiae brief along with the Student Press Law Center), has reportedly died at the age of 31. FIRE’s thoughts are with Amanda Tatro’s husband and family at this difficult time.
A Closer Look at ‘Tatro v. University of Minnesota’
June 22, 2012
As discussed here on The Torch, the Minnesota Supreme Court issued a ruling (PDF) Wednesday in Tatro v. University of Minnesota, finding that the University of Minnesota did not violate mortuary science student Amanda Tatro’s First Amendment rights by punishing her for the content of Facebook posts discussing her classroom work with cadavers. While the… Read more
Minnesota Supreme Court issues ruling in ‘Tatro’
June 20, 2012
Earlier today, the Minnesota Supreme Court issued a ruling (PDF) in Tatro v. University of Minnesota, an important student free speech case. The state Supreme Court upheld the Minnesota Court of Appeals’ problematic July 2011 decision, finding that the University of Minnesota did not violate the First Amendment rights of mortuary sciences student Amanda Tatro by… Read more
UM Student Newspaper Weighs in on ‘Tatro’ and Defends Students’ Free Speech
February 17, 2012
Last week, the Minnesota Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Tatro v. University of Minnesota, a controversial case involving the punishment of a mortuary sciences student for comments posted on Facebook. FIRE and the Student Press Law Center (SPLC) submitted an amici curiae brief on behalf of student Amanda Tatro, arguing that her punishment violated… Read more
Minnesota Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in ‘Tatro,’ with Student Speech Rights at Stake
February 9, 2012
Yesterday, the Minnesota Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Tatro v. University of Minnesota. As reported by The Chronicle of Higher Education, Tatro concerns the University of Minnesota’s punishment of mortuary sciences student Amanda Tatro for off-campus comments she posted on Facebook that her school labeled as threatening. However, as FIRE argued… Read more
A Roundup of 2011’s Free Speech Case Law
December 28, 2011
While FIRE has won numerous victories this year in working to protect individual rights on college campuses, 2011 was a mixed year for the defense of students’ rights by the courts. Importantly, this year highlighted divergent theories of the First Amendment rights of students off campus. While some courts have held that schools are limited… Read more
In Troubling Ruling, Minnesota Court of Appeals Upholds Punishment of Student for Facebook Posts
July 12, 2011
In a troubling ruling (PDF) for speech on campus issued yesterday, the Minnesota Court of Appeals held that a public university student’s First Amendment rights are not violated by discipline meted out for social networking posts when such posts "materially and substantially disrupted the work and discipline of the university." The facts of the case, Tatro… Read more
First Major Test of Academic Freedom Protections at University of Minnesota
March 22, 2010
Last March and November, my colleague Azhar Majeed noted the extra steps that some faculty bodies are taking to preserve their academic freedom in response to the ambiguous statement by the Supreme Court in Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006) explicitly reserving judgment on the question of whether faculty members at public colleges and… Read more
40 Percent of Minnesota College Students Say Certain Topics or Viewpoints Are ‘Off Limits’
March 18, 2010
A report on higher education in Minnesota released this morning by the American Council of Trustees and Alumni (ACTA) with the Freedom Foundation of Minnesota features FIRE’s work defending the First Amendment in the state. The report, “At a Crossroads: A Report Card on Public Higher Education in Minnesota” (PDF), includes a survey of students that… Read more
Latest on University of Minnesota Teacher Education Scandal
January 15, 2010
Regular Torch readers are familiar with the scandal created by the Race, Culture, Class, and Gender Task Group at the University of Minnesota’s College of Education and Human Development when the task group proposed an ideological litmus test for teachers based on a highly politicized view of “cultural competence.” Fortunately, after extensive public attention, the… Read more
Rights in the News: Yale and Minnesota Still in Headlines as FIRE Eyes 2010 Campaign
January 8, 2010
Even during the supposedly slow Christmas-to-New-Year’s stretch, FIRE’s cases continued to captivate the media, none more so than the recent brouhaha at Yale over a censored F. Scott Fitzgerald-quoting t-shirt calling Harvard men "sissies." Following Greg’s earlier writings in The Huffington Post, Robert wrote on the case for Pajamas Media. (Knowing such PC nonsense when… Read more
University of Minnesota Still in the Hot Seat
January 5, 2010
Here at FIRE we are holding the University of Minnesota to its promise that it will never "mandate any particular beliefs, or screen out people with ‘wrong beliefs’ from the University." We are watching carefully because if some of the university’s professors had their way, this ideological screening would be exactly what the College of… Read more
FIRE Op-Ed in ‘New York Post’ on University of Minnesota Victory
December 28, 2009
Today’s issue of the New York Post features an op-ed by FIRE’s Adam Kissel, in which he discusses the University of Minnesota–Twin Cities’ plan to impose a political litmus test on future teachers enrolled in its College of Education and Human Development. The plan would have redesigned the curriculum to enforce a narrow view of… Read more
Victory for Freedom of Conscience as University of Minnesota Backs Away from Ideological Screening for Ed Students
December 23, 2009
MINNEAPOLIS, December 23, 2009—In response to sustained pressure from the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), the University of Minnesota–Twin Cities has backed away from its plans to enforce a political litmus test for future teachers. The plans from its College of Education and Human Development (CEHD) involved redesigning admissions and the curriculum to… Read more
Victory for Freedom of Conscience as University of Minnesota Backs Away from Ideological Screening for Ed Students
December 23, 2009
Today’s press release reports that the University of Minnesota–Twin Cities has backed away from its plans to enforce a political litmus test for future teachers. As Torch readers know, the plans from its College of Education and Human Development (CEHD) involved redesigning admissions and the curriculum to enforce an ideology centered on a narrow view of "cultural competence." Those with the "wrong" views… Read more
Will the University of Minnesota Board of Regents Need to Intervene to Protect Freedom of Conscience?
December 18, 2009
Yesterday, FIRE reported that the University of Minnesota, in the face of widespread national outrage in the media, is defending the indefensible: a set of plans to impose an ideological litmus test on future teachers. The desire to teach “cultural competence” or to expose students to any set of values and beliefs is not itself… Read more
University of Minnesota Defends Ideological Screening for Ed Students; Academic Freedom Committee Meets Friday
December 17, 2009
Today’s press release explains that the University of Minnesota–Twin Cities has chosen to defend its plans to enforce a political litmus test for future teachers in the face of national outrage, rather than repudiate the parts of the plans that violate the academic freedom and freedom of conscience of future teachers. The plans from the… Read more
University of Minnesota Defends Ideological Screening for Ed Students; Academic Freedom Committee Meets Friday
December 17, 2009
MINNEAPOLIS, December 17, 2009—The University of Minnesota–Twin Cities is defending its plans to enforce a political litmus test for future teachers in the face of national outrage. The plans from its College of Education and Human Development (CEHD) involve redesigning admissions and the curriculum to enforce an ideology centered on a narrow view of “cultural competence.“… Read more
Media Outrage Grows over Teacher Education Scandal at University of Minnesota-Twin Cities
December 16, 2009
Fox News Channel’s The O’Reilly Factor is the latest media outlet to weigh in on the teacher education scandal at University of Minnesota–Twin Cities (transcript) (video). Bill O’Reilly gets it right in his interview with John Stossel: This is not just about introducing future teachers to other cultures but about invading and judging future teachers’ thoughts,… Read more
FOXNews.com Covers FIRE’s University of Minnesota Ed School Case
December 9, 2009
Late last month, FIRE wrote a letter to the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities about proposed changes that would implement what amounts to a political litmus test for enrollment and participation in its College of Education and Human Development’s teacher education program. FOXNews.com has now joined the coverage of the program with a front-page story entitled… Read more
Bloggers Debate University of Minnesota’s Teacher Education Redesign, But Some Miss Key Evidence
December 1, 2009
The University of Minnesota-Twin Cities College of Education & Human Development’s proposals to mandate the beliefs and values of its students have generated widespread attention since Katherine Kersten first reported on them in the Minneapolis Star Tribune, and FIRE’s letter expressing deep concern over the proposed requirements has served to further intensify the spotlight on… Read more
Spotlight on Speech Codes at University of Minnesota-Twin Cities
November 30, 2009
Given the uproar over the University of Minnesota – Twin Cities’ (U of M’s) plans to implement a re-education program for future teachers, which has generated quite a bit of media coverage in recent days, FIRE will be shining the spotlight heavily on U of M. We have already sent a letter to U of M… Read more
Teacher Re-Education Scandal at University of Minnesota Gains Steam
November 30, 2009
Last week, FIRE wrote University of Minnesota-Twin Cities (U of M) President Robert H. Bruininks about the proposed political and ideological litmus test for future teachers at U of M’s College of Education and Human Development. The college intends to mandate particular beliefs and values—"dispositions and commitments"—for future teachers. These are not just things like the disposition to deal… Read more
Jean K. Quam: American Dream lives on at the U
November 27, 2009
In her Nov. 22 column, Katherine Kersten suggested that the future of teacher preparation at the University of Minnesota will be a process of ideological indoctrination denouncing “the American Dream.” Just the opposite is true. The American Dream lives and thrives in the College of Education and Human Development. The college is engaged in a… Read more
In Letter to President of University of Minnesota – Twin Cities, FIRE Expresses Deep Concern over Political Litmus Test
November 25, 2009
FIRE sent a letter to University of Minnesota-Twin Cities President Robert H. Bruininks today, expressing deep concern over proposals generated by the College of Education and Human Development’s Teacher Education Redesign Initiative task groups. As Adam, who authored today’s letter, detailed in full yesterday here on The Torch, the "Race, Culture, Class, and Gender Task… Read more
Political Litmus Test for Future Teachers at University of Minnesota – Twin Cities
November 24, 2009
All signs are that the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities is planning to enforce a political litmus test for future teachers. The university’s College of Education and Human Development intends to mandate certain beliefs and values—”dispositions”—for future teachers. Yet that is not enough. It even intends to redesign its admissions process so that it screens out… Read more
University of Minnesota Comes Through for Dissenting Student
March 25, 2008
With FIRE’s help, a graduate student at the University of Minnesota has been saved from the Office for Student Conduct and Academic Integrity after his professor reported him for disrupting the class—simply because he and the professor had openly disagreed about a number of issues raised during his class presentation. According to the student, during… Read more
Follow FIRE