University of Texas at Arlington

Location: Arlington, Texas
Website: http://www.uta.edu
Type: Public
Federal Circuit: 5th Circuit

Speech Code Rating

University of Texas at Arlington has been given the speech code rating Red. A red light university has at least one policy that both clearly and substantially restricts freedom of speech. Read more here.

Red Light Policies

  • Procedure 14-1: Complaint, Investigation, and Grievance Procedures for Sexual Harassment and Sexual Misconduct

    Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies
    Last updated: June 17, 2015

    1. Definition of Sexual Harassment

      Sexual harassment is defined by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the courts to be any unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, or other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature, when:

      • submission to such conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of employment (or a student’s status in a course, program, or activity);
      • submission to, or rejection of such conduct by an employee is used as a basis for employment decisions affecting the individual. In the case of a student, it is used as a basis for academic or decisions affecting a student; or,
      • such conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with the individual’s employment (or the student’s educational experience) or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive academic environment.
    2. Definition of Sexual Misconduct

      Sexual misconduct includes sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, or verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature directed towards another individual that does not rise to the level of sexual harassment but is unprofessional and inappropriate for the workplace or classroom.Examples of behavior that could be considered sexual harassment or sexual misconduct includes, but is not limited to, the following:

      1. physical contact of a sexual nature including touching, patting, hugging, or brushing against a person’s body;
      2. explicit or implicit propositions of offers to engage in sexual activity;
      3. comments of a sexual nature including sexually explicit statement, questions, jokes or anecdotes, remarks of a sexual nature about a person’s clothing or body, remarks about sexual activity, speculation about sexual experience;
      4. exposure to sexually oriented graffiti, pictures, posters or materials;
      5. physical interference with or restriction to an individual’s movements.

    » Read More


Yellow Light Policies
  • Policy 11-200: Speech, Expression and Assembly- Prohibited Expression

    Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies
    Last updated: June 17, 2015

    1. “Verbal harassment” means hostile or offensive speech, oral, written or symbolic that

    a.  personally describes or is personally directed to one or more specific individuals; and

    b.  is sufficiently severe, pervasive or persistent to create an objectively hostile environment that interferes with or diminishes the victim’s ability to participate in or benefit from the services, activities or privileges provided by the University; and

    c.  is not necessary to the expression of any idea described in paragraph 2 of this subsection.

    2.   To make an argument for or against the substance of any political, religious, philosophical, ideological or academic idea is not verbal harassment even if some listeners are offended by the argument or idea. The categories of sexually harassing speech set forth by the UT Arlington Standards of Conduct Guide are rarely, if ever, necessary to argue for or against the substance of any political, religious, philosophical, ideological or academic idea.

    3.  Verbal harassment may consist of threats, insults, epithets, ridicule, personal attacks or the categories of harassing sexual speech set forth by the UT Arlington Standards of Conduct Guide and is often based on the victim’s appearance, personal characteristics or group membership, including but not limited to race, color, religion, national origin, gender, age, disability, citizenship, veteran status, sexual orientation, ideology, political views or political affiliation.

    » Read More

  • Policy 5-513: Sexual Harassment and Sexual Misconduct Policy

    Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies
    Last updated: June 17, 2015

    This Policy applies to all University administrators, faculty, staff, students, third parties within the institution’s control, including visitors, and applicants for employment. It applies to conduct regardless of where it occurs, including off University property, if it potentially affects the complainant’s education or employment with the University.

    Definitions: …

    Other Inappropriate Conduct of a Sexual Nature: Includes unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, or verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature directed towards another individual that does not rise to the level of sexual harassment but is unprofessional, inappropriate for the workplace or classroom and is not protected speech. It also includes consensual sexual conduct that is unprofessional and inappropriate for the workplace or classroom.

    Sexual Harassment: Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, or other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature, submission to which is made a term or condition of a person’s exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege, power, or immunity, either explicitly or implicitly. Sexual harassment is a form of sex discrimination that includes …

    1. Verbal conduct not necessary to an argument for or against the substance of any political, religious, philosophical, ideological, or academic idea, including oral, written, or symbolic expression, including but not limited to:
      1. explicit or implicit propositions to engage in sexual activity;
      2. gratuitous comments, jokes, questions, anecdotes or remarks of a sexual nature about clothing or bodies;
      3. gratuitous remarks about sexual activities or speculation about sexual experiences;
      4. persistent, unwanted sexual or romantic attention;
      5. subtle or overt pressure for sexual favors;
      6. exposure to sexually suggestive visual displays such as photographs, graffiti, posters, calendars or other materials; or
      7. deliberate, repeated humiliation or intimidation based upon sex.

    » Read More


Green Light Policies
  • Policy 11-900: Speech, Expression and Assembly- Public Assemblies Without Amplified Sound

    Speech Code Category: Protest and Demonstration Policies
    Last updated: June 17, 2015

    “Publicly assemble” and “public assembly” include any gathering of persons, including discussions, rallies, and demonstrations. … University persons and organizations may publicly assemble on campus in any place where, at the time of the assembly, the persons assembling are permitted to be.

    » Read More

  • Policy 11-100: Speech, Expression and Assembly- Governing Principles

    Speech Code Category: Advertised Commitments to Free Expression
    Last updated: June 17, 2015

    The freedoms of speech, expression and assembly are fundamental rights of all persons and are central to the mission of the University. Students, faculty and staff have the right to assemble, to speak, and to attempt to attract the attention of others and corresponding rights to hear the speech of others when they choose to listen, and to ignore the speech of others when they choose not to listen.

    » Read More


This school does not have any media coverage at this time.
  • Right to Wear Greek Letters Vindicated at UT Arlington

    November 30, 2012

    Recently, FIRE intervened at the University of Texas at Arlington (UTA) after the Sigma Phi Epsilon (SigEp) fraternity brought to our attention what I suspect is an all-too-common punishment against fraternities and sororities: the prohibition on displaying their letters in any way while the chapter was under investigation. After FIRE brought this issue to UTA’s attention, the university promised that students and student organizations at UTA enjoy the full freedoms of the First Amendment.  Here’s the background on the chain of events resulting in this unconstitutional punishment for SigEp, as we wrote in a letter to UTA President James D. […]

    » Read More